Re: T3: Timeline Problems - SPOILERS

Curt wrote:
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>>
>>>   	And the remote-controlled cars are ridiculous. It seems that, 
>>
>>Gotta correct you there: The terminatrix has nano-technology
> 
> That's beautiful, JM. Was that point spelled out in the
> movie? I obviously wasn't paying attention. Excellent
> explanation, imo. Kudos.

Cheers! ;-) Yeah she walks up to the cars, looks at them and then you 
see her finger changing into an injector. You don't actually see her 
doing it. The T101 talks about the injectors earlier on, when he 
explains T-X's capabilities.

All in all, I was entertained, but I think it is a bit of a shame that 
the movie is so comical, because I still like the pictures of darkness 
and despair of the original most. If you compare T3 to T1, it doesn't 
measure up at all imho, but after the bar scene I decided to just enjoy 
the movie for what it is: A Terminator spoof, but a pretty good one.

JM