Re: T3: Timeline Problems - SPOILERS

"Jacques E. Bouchard" <jacques_e_bouchard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<Xns93B145FB28911jacquesbouchardyahoo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> jbrunner007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Jack Torrance) wrote in 
> news:c10bec26.0307062231.1db63717@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > I saw the movie this evening. Go see it. You will love it. I am the
> > biggest fan of T2 and James C. and this is not a bad sequel.
> > The ending is very clever.
> 
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 
> SPOLIER WARNING!!!
> 

There is an even bigger plothole that seems to have been overlooked in
T3. By making the Skynet just a large self-aware program that is
spread through the 'net on thousands/millions of computers etc... and
getting rid of the original premise that it has a "single core", what
happens to Skynet when the myriad EMP pulses from the nuclear weapons
goes off? Skynet will cease to exist. I'd rather they had a core that
was heavily ****elded/guarded. Otherwise we have Skynet who is
suicidal. Not to mention that the various machines it controls would
stop working. <SIGH>