Re: T3: Timeline Problems - SPOILERS

Spoilers
























>    	And the remote-controlled cars are ridiculous. It seems that, 
>even in the 21st century, people are still blissfully ignorant of what 
>it is a computer can do. Hint: it CANNOT work mechanical devices 
>remotely such as turning a steering wheeel and pressing down an 
>accelerator! They can add numbers, but they can't do telekinesis!

I can't explain the steering or braking, but I can see manipulating
the cruise control (not that the average LAPD car has it) to control
the acceleration. Good luck doing it remotely, though. Maybe they
should have had the TX install a little transmitter with an amazing
X10 camera on the dash. heh heh

>    	And remember the argument from T2? The terminator cannot shape 
>itself into a complex mechanical device such as a bomb and simply blow 
>up the city and John Connor with him. Yet, in T3, the terminatrix comes 
>equipped with complex weapons. Then why not a thermonuclear device? The 
>"screenwriter" never bothers to plug that plot hole.

They didn't plug some plot holes from T2 either. In T1 Reese said that
"nothing dead will go" through time...there had to be living tissue.
Then in T2, liquid metal can mysteriously travel in time and even has
to appear "****d" when it does. They ignore this in T3 as well, as the
liquid metal covered TX goes back in time. (and still appears ****d
for no reason)


Since non-living tissue can now go through time,  I wonder why
Arnold's character doesn't bring a plasma rifle either time.