Re: T3: Timeline Problems - SPOILERS

Curt <curt_james@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:b4ojgvoahqktu4an6lbiq2dca4vdfuvb8b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 10:52:48 GMT, "Jacques E. Bouchard"
><jacques_e_bouchard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>SPOLIER WARNING!!!
>>
>>
> I wasn't terribly disappointed, but I wasn't entirely
> impressed either. It was a kickass movie and it did have
> some great Arnold one liners. Visually, it was fantastic.
> 
> I enjoyed your commentary. My question is regarding the
> hydrogen fuel cells. Does the T800 have any other energy
> source or is he/it powered by only those two cells?
> 
> If so, then we have a problem. He ditched the one while
> driving with John. And the second one he stuffed in the TX's
> mouth. But he was still powered up as he said, "You're
> terminated!"
> 
> If I take the battery out of my laptop, that sucker is OFF
> immediately. No smart remarks. No jokes. No nuttin'.
> 
> Am I missing something?


    	You're absolutely right. More sloppy "writing".


> And this movie didn't follow the standard time travel
> results. Wouldn't T2's events have affected John's memories,
> his very being, as well as the psychiatrist's memories?
> 
> I'm not going to give it much thought, but...


    	I decided from the beginning to overlook the paradoxes. But T3 is 
definitely shoddy writing. I'm afraid the franchise is only going to go 
downhill from here.



jaybee