Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Pern > Re: Discussing ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 316 of 403
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discussing Mccaffrey - Was Re: Pratchett on Rowling, again, sort of

by "norrin" <adweiland@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 7, 2007 at 06:55 PM

Mike Schilling wrote:
> For some people (me, for one) that line *is* fuzzy.  _The Anubis Gates_,
for
> instance. Time-travel, alternate history, *and* Egyptian sorcerers. 
Which?

The absence of magic is one of the necessary characteristics of science
fiction. The presence of magic is sufficient to call the book fantasy.

According to Clarke's Law, advanced technology may appear to be magic,
but there's always an explanation like the Old Ones or the Man Behind
the Curtain. If the story is simple enough, it could be a guy in a
rubber
suit.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Discussing Mccaffrey - Was Re: Pratchett on Rowling, again,
"norrin" <ad  2007-01-07 18:55:51 
Re: Discussing Mccaffrey - Was Re: Pratchett on Rowling, again,
"Anthony Cerrato&quo  2007-01-07 23:59:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 9:37:50 CST 2008.