Re: Fri. 5/9 'Will it Float?' Sorcery

Bill Kawalec wrote:
> "Crash Bandicoot" <NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:482bdf3e$0$11605$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Donz5 wrote:
>>
>>> It made it suspicious to you. It didn't make it  suspicious to me. Can
>>> you respect that?
>>>
>>
>> I'll respect nothing until you stop dilly-dallying around my original 
>> question:
>>
>> Yes or no: Do you admit the trick would seem less suspicious then the
way 
>> it was presented if a random audience member participated in it?
> 
> 
> damn
> get a life
> ok, the trick was flawed, but I accept the basic premise, because if
there 
> were duplicate gl*****, they got a lot of damn gall calling themselves 
> "magicians."
> 


I love it. Someone with over 24,000 hits on Google for Usenet group 
postings is telling *me* to get a life?? I'll work on that right away.

I know how the trick was done; and I know the solution wasn't a 
duplicate pair of gl*****. That is not the point...

For the 2,000th time, I'm saying they set themselves up for failure by 
changing the trick from the way they perform it in their live show.
They shouldn't have used Paul Shaffer as the audience "volunteer".
It's like a lawyer using the defendant's wife as a key witness;
of course she's going to say what a great guy he is...and it's worth 
jack squat.