Re: Fri. 5/9 'Will it Float?' Sorcery

randwill wrote:
> "Bill Kawalec" <billkawalec@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:77ydnQ-EiOQjH7vVnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> so you think Paul was a co-conspirator...
>>
> 
> No, but nothing in the presentation negates that possibility in the 
> audience's mind.  Using the gl***** of a randomly selected audience
member 
> would have been less suspicious.
> 
> Paul may have been a co-conspirator in that he possibly ran through the 
> segment with P&T in rehearsal. That would have been a good time for Penn
to 
> tell him that he didn't have any lines in the bit. 
> 
> 


Haha....exactly. Paul totally stepped all over that bit.

I agree that using a random audience member would have been a more 
impressive stunt. Why did they use Paul instead of an audience member?
That choice alone creates suspicion that it's a setup.

Have you ever seen when a magician will choose someone from the audience
by blowing up a balloon (but not tying it) and then they release it and 
it flies wildly around the room and someone in the audience catches it.
Unless the entire audience are ****lls, it pretty much guarantees the 
person in the audience is not a plant.