Re: Fri. 5/9 'Will it Float?' Sorcery

"randwill" <rwilliams4254@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:nJrVj.187745$XH2.18825@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bill Kawalec" <billkawalec@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:eaqdnd6KJMezurvVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "randwill" <rwilliams4254@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:gknVj.155423$qg2.72183@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> <Marcia R.spamlessinlasvegas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:4825F13D.9CA82DE8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> There was no reason to think they weren't a duplicate pair, so I
found 
>>>> the whole
>>>> thing to be a huge let down.
>>>>
>>>> Marcia
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's sad but true.  Although it wasn't a duplicate pair of glasses, 
>>> there was no reason for the audience to appreciate that fact.
>>
>>
>>
>> well, there sort of is, in that they are prescription glasses, and Paul

>> wore them after the act was done.
>>
>
>
> True, but even that is negated by the fact that Paul has more
prescription 
> glasses than Imelda Marcos had shoes, so it wouldn't be that surprising
if 
> he had two identical pairs.  In this case that wouldn't be necessary but

> it was still a weak effort if you compare it to other P&T appearances.
>


so you think Paul was a co-conspirator...