Re: Fri. 5/9 'Will it Float?' Sorcery

On May 10, 9:11=A0pm, "randwill" <rwilliams4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:eaqdnd6KJMezurvVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > "randwill" <rwilliams4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:gknVj.155423$qg2.72183@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> <Marcia R.spamlessinlasve...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>news:4825F13D.9CA82DE8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> There was no reason to think they weren't a duplicate pair, so I
found=

> >>> the whole
> >>> thing to be a huge let down.
>
> >>> Marcia
>
> >> That's sad but true. =A0Although it wasn't a duplicate pair of
gl*****,=

> >> there was no reason for the audience to appreciate that fact.
>
> > well, there sort of is, in that they are prescription gl*****, and
Paul
> > wore them after the act was done.
>
> True, but even that is negated by the fact that Paul has more
prescription=

> gl***** than Imelda Marcos had shoes, so it wouldn't be that surprising
if=

> he had two identical pairs. =A0In this case that wouldn't be necessary
but=
 it
> was still a weak effort if you compare it to other P&T appearances.

And we're back to the assumption that P&T knew what pair Paul was
going to wear that hour.