Re: Fri. 5/9 'Will it Float?' Sorcery

"Bill Kawalec" <billkawalec@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:eaqdnd6KJMezurvVnZ2dnUVZ_siknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "randwill" <rwilliams4254@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:gknVj.155423$qg2.72183@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> <Marcia R.spamlessinlasvegas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:4825F13D.9CA82DE8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> There was no reason to think they weren't a duplicate pair, so I found

>>> the whole
>>> thing to be a huge let down.
>>>
>>> Marcia
>>>
>>
>> That's sad but true.  Although it wasn't a duplicate pair of gl*****, 
>> there was no reason for the audience to appreciate that fact.
>
>
>
> well, there sort of is, in that they are prescription gl*****, and Paul 
> wore them after the act was done.
>


True, but even that is negated by the fact that Paul has more prescription

gl***** than Imelda Marcos had shoes, so it wouldn't be that surprising if

he had two identical pairs.  In this case that wouldn't be necessary but
it 
was still a weak effort if you compare it to other P&T appearances.