Re: Fri. 5/9 'Will it Float?' Sorcery

"randwill" <rwilliams4254@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:gknVj.155423$qg2.72183@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <Marcia R.spamlessinlasvegas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:4825F13D.9CA82DE8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> There was no reason to think they weren't a duplicate pair, so I found 
>> the whole
>> thing to be a huge let down.
>>
>> Marcia
>>
>
> That's sad but true.  Although it wasn't a duplicate pair of glasses, 
> there was no reason for the audience to appreciate that fact.



well, there sort of is, in that they are prescription glasses, and Paul
wore 
them after the act was done.




>
> Many years ago on a P&T appearance, they borrowed Dave's watch and 
> vanished it. They then had Dave choose a fish from a display of several 
> fish on ice on a large display stand.  They cut open the fish and inside

> was Dave's watch.  The crucial difference between this routine and the
one 
> with Paul's glasses was that they had Dave sign a tag attached to the 
> watch before they vanished it. Of course the signed tag was still
attached 
> to the watch when it was extracted from among the fish's guts. 
> Incidentally, Dave signed the tag "Regis", but it was the same tag and
the 
> same watch.
>