On May 3, 11:43=C2=A0am, Sally <SallyDr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 2, 4:25=EF=BF=BDpm, R H Draney <dadoc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sally filted:
>
> > >The only reason I can think of why intelligent women why might not be
> > >as good as dumb women in bed, as Dave claims has been postulated, is
> > >because the book they're reading gets in the way during ***. I can
see
> > >how a hard-cover could be painful. A soft-cover would just be a turn-
> > >off, especially if Einstein were on the cover. Now, if she needed
> > >gl*****, too...
>
> > It's not true, but you do need two of them....
>
> > And a webcam....r
>
> > --
> > What good is being an executive if you never get to execute anyone?
>
> Two of what? (See...I can be dumb. Hint, hint.) I have two. Also
> gl*****. Did you mean I should've said the book "she's" reading? A
> WEBCAM? Hey--that's dirty!
>
> Sally- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
re: nerdness & ***iness
Al did not always look like that unruly hair, clown image, and ahem
apparently played around
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein
,
|
