On May 2, 4:25=EF=BF=BDpm, R H Draney <dadoc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Sally filted:
>
>
>
> >The only reason I can think of why intelligent women why might not be
> >as good as dumb women in bed, as Dave claims has been postulated, is
> >because the book they're reading gets in the way during ***. I can see
> >how a hard-cover could be painful. A soft-cover would just be a turn-
> >off, especially if Einstein were on the cover. Now, if she needed
> >gl*****, too...
>
> It's not true, but you do need two of them....
>
> And a webcam....r
>
> --
> What good is being an executive if you never get to execute anyone?
Two of what? (See...I can be dumb. Hint, hint.) I have two. Also
gl*****. Did you mean I should've said the book "she's" reading? A
WEBCAM? Hey--that's dirty!
Sally
|
