Re: An atheist professor & his student

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:11:27 +1100, Welsh Dog <welshdog@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:56:33 -0500, Louis Epstein <le@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>Toon <toon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>: On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:51:35 -0500, "BubblyBabs" <ng@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>: wrote:
>>: 
>>:>
>>:>> : There is nodirect evidence to sup****t god.  There is no direct
>>:>> : evidence to sup****t the universe came into being without god.
>>:>>
>>:>> There is no possibility of there being a Universe unless
>>:>> there were a God to cause it.
>>:>
>>:>Why does there need to be a "God" to cause it?  It's just something
that 
>>:>happened...  Maybe it's as some speculate - the universe will stop
expanding 
>>:>and will collapse in on itself and the process will start over
again... 
>>:>Maybe next time there won't be any lifeforms at all on any of the
planets 
>>:>that form...  But there doesn't need to be a god for this to occur...
>>: 
>>: I think the universe's creation created god, as a way to help run it.
>>
>>No...God is by definition uniquely uncreated.

Prove it.

>If 'god' can be uniquely uncreated... why shouldn't the universe??
>
>Welshdog

Why would anyone chose the name god to describe a diety?  It's dog
backwards.  Devil is lived.  Think about it.