On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:45:19 -0500, Louis Epstein <le@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>hanson_mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>: On Oct 11, 1:59?pm, Louis Epstein <l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>:> hanson_m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>:> : On Oct 5, 10:56?am, Louis Epstein <l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
<snip>
>: Well, now you're making three more assertions, but they are
>: unnecessary. The correct answer to the question, "How did the universe
>: come into being?" is "I don't know." You can fill in the terra
>: incognita with fictional geography if you wish to - a poly-dimensional
>: transcendent god, perhaps - but you need to be clear that it is a
>: product of your mind and not something that logic demands.
>Logic defines God as the ultimate reason the universe came into being.
>The terra incognita can not be nonexistent if the existence of any
>terra cognita is to be explained.
>You can know nothing about God,but you can't defend a position that
>anything could exist unless there were that unknown God.
Not even the eternally expanding and contracting universe??
Welshdog
--
News and views... for people like youse!!
Australian Opinion
(http://australianopinion.com)
Not as strange as it looks!
|
