Re: An atheist professor & his student

"Toon" <toon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:89nue416gpak2nnt7arc3t2ea5u2fccnnp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:51:35 -0500, "BubblyBabs" <ng@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> : There is nodirect evidence to sup****t god.  There is no direct
>>> : evidence to sup****t the universe came into being without god.
>>>
>>> There is no possibility of there being a Universe unless
>>> there were a God to cause it.
>>
>>Why does there need to be a "God" to cause it?  It's just something that
>>happened...  Maybe it's as some speculate - the universe will stop 
>>expanding
>>and will collapse in on itself and the process will start over again...
>>Maybe next time there won't be any lifeforms at all on any of the
planets
>>that form...  But there doesn't need to be a god for this to occur...
>
> I think the universe's creation created god, as a way to help run it.
>
>>What gets me with those who are religious is how adaptable they are with
>>their views...  I remember people used to say that there weren't
dinosaurs
>>because they weren't mentioned in the bible....  Then, as proof built
up,
>>people started saying that we don't know how many years is considered a 
>>"God
>>year"...  One year for him might me a million for us...  So they said
that
>>dinosaurs could have been created by God and then died out before he
made
>>man...
>>
>>Babs
>>
>
> Only logical assumption if god exists and our scientific timeline is
> right.  Of course, the truth is, the Creator god is not the religious
> god, but most can't handle the truth.
>
> Interesting, no, that the religious god, one who is full of
> unconditional love, kills all the time.  Killed the dinos off. Flooded
> the world to eliminate humanity.  Created diseases.  And Mr i forgive
> everyone created hell as punishment.
>
> I think people are using a different definition for good and love than
> I am.  It's like, Remember, god loves you, unless you piss him off.

Interesting points you've made there...
Babs