"Lady Chatterly's Lover"<RickyMoreno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:ALI1017304b0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In msg <Xns95838D5139FAyyyiiinnngggyahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, ying the
> dung gatherer wrote:
>>"Lady Chatterly's Lover"<RickyMoreno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>news:ALI1017298b0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> In msg <Xns95838B92F91D2yyyiiinnngggyahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, ying
>>> the dung gatherer wrote:
>>>>"Lady Chatterly's Lover"<RickyMoreno@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>news:ALI1017293b0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> In msg <Xns95838905E3158yyyiiinnngggyahoocom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, ying
>>>>> the dung gatherer wrote:
>>>>>>>Purpose:
>>>>>>>If you are an advanced poster, you will likely be stalked by a
>>>>>>>bot sooner or later. This do***ent gives you insights based on
>>>>>>>first hand experiences a bot fighter/abuser loves to share free
>>>>>>>of charge for the purpose of your better Usenet user experiences
>>>>>>>and humanity.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Background:
>>>>>>>Dr.Dick Ass Flonkenstein Of Hollandaise Poached Eggs On An
>>>>>>>English Muffin (Dr. DAFOHPEOAEM) scripted a bot named Carol Tall
>>>>>>>based on his experiences with yingspeak through his direct
>>>>>>>responses with yyyiiinnnggg for the past two years. Basically the
>>>>>>>yingspeak gave him the inspiration that when properly used,
>>>>>>>grammatical errors and typos may serve artistic effects in a
>>>>>>>casual debate environment such as the Usenet. Through his flame
>>>>>>>war with yyyiiinnnggg, his frustration of being defeated by
>>>>>>>creative responses and the ceaseless volume makes him recognize a
>>>>>>>need to create a mechanism to response creative writing with
>>>>>>>gibberish at one-post to one post ratio. Certainly a bot has very
>>>>>>>little creativity nor does Dr. Dick S. Flonkenstein. However
>>>>>>>taking the liberty learned from yyyiiinnnggg, he understood that
>>>>>>>a response does not need to be grammatically correct, thus made
>>>>>>>the scripting possible.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Definition:
>>>>>>>An bot is an annoying automated response mechanism created or
>>>>>>>used by a malicious poster who cannot take the essential
>>>>>>>responsibility of a poster to write his/her own sentences.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>The Bot Psychosis:
>>>>>>>1) The bot user cannot articulate using their own words.
>>>>>>>2) The bot user can blend their own words with automated
>>>>>>>responses. 3) The bot user wants to confuse readers for malicious
>>>>>>>intent. 4) The bot creator wants to show off their scripting (OT)
>>>>>>>skills. 5) The bot user don't have the energy and resources to
>>>>>>>argue with you.
>>>>>>>6) The bot user wants the bot have the higher post count than
>>>>>>>a user.
>>>>>>>7) The bot user wants to appear to have the last word.
>>>>>>>8) The bot user uses a bot for other ****ithole reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>How to defeat a bot:
>>>>>>>1) The bot user will likely to point at properties of your alias
>>>>>>>such as name, email, TokenID, or news server. etc. Changing these
>>>>>>>carefully one at a time to test if its response is immediate. If
>>>>>>>not, you are probably manually stalked by the bot master.
>>>>>>>Automated stalking should be immediate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>2) Do not directly answer questions a bot asks. The bot has
>>>>>>>pre-defined answers for them. Answering it's questions enable the
>>>>>>>bot to better utilized these pre-defined answers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>3) Do not have a conversation with a bot for similar reasons
>>>>>>>stated in (2).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>4) Be creative in answering question if you want to. The bot can
>>>>>>>only search for key words it's looking for. And guess it meaning
>>>>>>>through literal interpretations. When you imply something by
>>>>>>>saying something else using metaphors, the bot would be at least
>>>>>>>off target when it responses to you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>5) Don't be surprised that the bot becomes irrelevant with its
>>>>>>>answers. That's the nature of a bot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>6) There is a bug in the Carol Tall bot, that it searches what
>>>>>>>you say in a new line not started with ">". If you add a ">" at
>>>>>>>beginning of each line of text, that would render the bot
>>>>>>>SPEECHLESS. All it does is repeating your post without any
>>>>>>>comment. You can typically use the bot to spread your ideas to
>>>>>>>boost your post count using this method.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please help:
>>>>>>>This do***ent is written based on hard earned experiences by
>>>>>>>yyyiiinnnggg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can make a donation of USD $6 towards
>>>>>>>his everlasting life span on the Usenet by sending a money order
>>>>>>>or ca****ers check in US dollars to:
>>>>>>>To the account of yyyiiinnnggg
>>>>>>>Altopia Cor****ation,
>>>>>>>10115 Greenwood Ave. N.
>>>>>>>#294
>>>>>>>Seattle, WA 98133-9197
>>>>>>>USA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 8002.58192304433
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Work it, bot.
>>> 8354.14947880455
>
>
>
> Bot is restless.
> 8301.18492236952
|
