In article <ha-0908040017570001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Brandon Hex (ha@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
dropped a +5 bundle of words...
> In article <MPG.1b8099f9c7b7294e98989d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Star****ne Moonbeam
> <silverbells@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > In article <10hddenc8ecqpdb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Bob Chipeska
> > (bob_chipeska@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) dropped a +5 bundle of
> > words...
> >
> > >
> > > "Star****ne Moonbeam" <silverbells@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:MPG.1b7f7004ee18b56c989873@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > In article <umhRc.102$cq.81@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Citizen_Cain
> > > > (noemail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Albatröss" <albatross@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > news:7gvah05u5msdcgujtmvq0hhcllcgs24jfk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:16:06 -0700, "Citizen_Cain"
> > > > > > <no_email@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >"Albatröss" <albatross@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > > >news:rpc8h098rg03gu1m1knchvtg1rkbhgupjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:34:23 -0700, "Citizen_Cain"
> > > > > > >> <no_email@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >"Meat-->Plow" <Meat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > > >> >news:2v27h0htqcco2faggvj4kj3mhpf7vs1vl8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >> >> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:33:13 -0400, Tinplated
> > > > > > >> ><Throwaway59@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> >On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:56:57 -0500, "Bob Chipeska"
> > > > > > >> >> ><bob_chipeska@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> >>Remember, Emmett gets out of the pokey on Sunday,
August 8.
> > > He'll
> > > > > be
> > > > > > >> >online
> > > > > > >> >> >>via a free library account within hours. Emmett, meet
Joseph
> > > > > Bartlo.
> > > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> >Anybody know if his release is conditional (e.g.
> > > probation/parole)
> > > > > > >> >> >or if he is out free and clear? If the former, how long
will it
> > > > > > >> >> >take for him to get re-jugged on a violation? On the
other
> > > hand,
> > > > > > >> >> >he'll probably screw up anyway and get locked up on
something
> > > new.
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> >Gulley meets Bartlo? Mental note: lock up cats, lay in
supply
> > > of
> > > > > > >> >> >replacement keyboards. This is gonna be fun....
> > > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > > >> >> >JD "1,000 quatloos on Megabrow OctalBot" S
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> yeh it's conditional.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Current Release Date: 08/08/2004
> > > > > > >> >> (Release Date subject to change pending gain time
award, gain
> > > time
> > > > > > >> >forfeiture,
> > > > > > >> >> or review. A 'TO BE SET' Release Date is to be
established
> > > pending
> > > > > > >> >review.)
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> 07/25/2003 BREVARD CO JAIL DETAIN 09/16/2003
> > > > > > >> >> 07/28/2004 BREVARD CO SO DETAIN
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Incarceration History:
> > > > > > >> >> Date In-Custody Date Out-of-Custody
> > > > > > >> >> 07/11/2003 Currently Incarcerated
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> His release date is 8/8/2004
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >So basically, they're going to let him out but they can
tell him
> > > what
> > > > > he
> > > > > > >can
> > > > > > >> >and can't do until a certain period of time?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Yep that sounds like probation, but emma never listens so
that is
> > > what
> > > > > > >> makes it so fun.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >How soon do you think until he shows up via Google Beta & a
public
> > > > > library
> > > > > > >IP?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it took him less then 48 hours last time he was
released so I
> > > > > > would guess no more then that. You have to give the runt time
to get
> > > > > > home and pump up the tires on his bike.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Serious question here, no trolling involved: Part of the
condition of
> > > his
> > > > > release on parole last time was that he not access the Internet,
right?
> > > So
> > > > > does he have the same conditions in place this time around, or
can he
> > > get
> > > > > online and whine his freakishly small head off about anything
and
> > > > > everything, and not have anything happen unless he crosses the
line
> > > again
> > > > > (which, in all probability, he probably will).
> > > >
> > > > It *sounds* like he isn't supposed to be accessing the net after
he gets
> > > > out, since it's a conditional release (according to the info I've
seen
> > > > on here). That means he's still on some kind of hook, if it was
> > > > unconditional, he could do whatever he wanted when he got out.
> > >
> > > Does it really matter what the conditions are? It is Emmett we're
talking
> > > about here.
> >
> > And he'll probably violate them within a week and we won't see him for
> > another couple of years.
> >
>
>
> Are you wasting time with all these trolls when you could be with yer
kids?
>
The kids are sleeping, dip****.
>
> Yer not proving me right at all about that.
>
I know. I also know that it pisses you off to no end.
>
> Maybe you should use yer kids as weapons more often. Since yer not doing
> anything else with them.
>
> At least as weapons they get the attention they deserve.
Stop threatening kids, you whiner.
--
Star****ne Moonbeam
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
|
