"Star****ne Moonbeam" <silverbells@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b7f7004ee18b56c989873@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <umhRc.102$cq.81@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Citizen_Cain
> (noemail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
>
> >
> > "Albatröss" <albatross@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:7gvah05u5msdcgujtmvq0hhcllcgs24jfk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:16:06 -0700, "Citizen_Cain"
> > > <no_email@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >"Albatröss" <albatross@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > >news:rpc8h098rg03gu1m1knchvtg1rkbhgupjb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:34:23 -0700, "Citizen_Cain"
> > > >> <no_email@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >"Meat-->Plow" <Meat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > >> >news:2v27h0htqcco2faggvj4kj3mhpf7vs1vl8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> >> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:33:13 -0400, Tinplated
> > > >> ><Throwaway59@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:56:57 -0500, "Bob Chipeska"
> > > >> >> ><bob_chipeska@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >>Remember, Emmett gets out of the pokey on Sunday, August 8.
He'll
> > be
> > > >> >online
> > > >> >> >>via a free library account within hours. Emmett, meet Joseph
> > Bartlo.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >Anybody know if his release is conditional (e.g.
probation/parole)
> > > >> >> >or if he is out free and clear? If the former, how long will
it
> > > >> >> >take for him to get re-jugged on a violation? On the other
hand,
> > > >> >> >he'll probably screw up anyway and get locked up on something
new.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >Gulley meets Bartlo? Mental note: lock up cats, lay in supply
of
> > > >> >> >replacement keyboards. This is gonna be fun....
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >JD "1,000 quatloos on Megabrow OctalBot" S
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> yeh it's conditional.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Current Release Date: 08/08/2004
> > > >> >> (Release Date subject to change pending gain time award,
gain
time
> > > >> >forfeiture,
> > > >> >> or review. A 'TO BE SET' Release Date is to be established
pending
> > > >> >review.)
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> 07/25/2003 BREVARD CO JAIL DETAIN 09/16/2003
> > > >> >> 07/28/2004 BREVARD CO SO DETAIN
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Incarceration History:
> > > >> >> Date In-Custody Date Out-of-Custody
> > > >> >> 07/11/2003 Currently Incarcerated
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> His release date is 8/8/2004
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >So basically, they're going to let him out but they can tell him
what
> > he
> > > >can
> > > >> >and can't do until a certain period of time?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Yep that sounds like probation, but emma never listens so that is
what
> > > >> makes it so fun.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >How soon do you think until he shows up via Google Beta & a public
> > library
> > > >IP?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I think it took him less then 48 hours last time he was released so
I
> > > would guess no more then that. You have to give the runt time to get
> > > home and pump up the tires on his bike.
> >
> >
> > Serious question here, no trolling involved: Part of the condition of
his
> > release on parole last time was that he not access the Internet,
right?
So
> > does he have the same conditions in place this time around, or can he
get
> > online and whine his freakishly small head off about anything and
> > everything, and not have anything happen unless he crosses the line
again
> > (which, in all probability, he probably will).
>
> It *sounds* like he isn't supposed to be accessing the net after he gets
> out, since it's a conditional release (according to the info I've seen
> on here). That means he's still on some kind of hook, if it was
> unconditional, he could do whatever he wanted when he got out.
Does it really matter what the conditions are? It is Emmett we're talking
about here.
|
