"Chad Bryant" <chad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:c1ggl5$d3k$0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Robert Buchanan (?????????@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) writes:
>
> > SEE A. Cain at alt.usenet.kooks on 24 Feb 2004! Reserve your tickets
> > now!
> >
> >>
> >> "Robert Buchanan" <?????????@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:403aeb51$0$4213$ad3619e8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> SEE A. Cain at alt.usenet.kooks on 23 Feb 2004! Reserve your tickets
> >>> now!
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > Like a moth to a flame,"Chad Bryant" <chad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>> > gravitated towards my posts in message
> >>> > news:c1eeof$jq9$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >> The Saxist (imasaxist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) writes:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >>> A HS dropout makes 11,000 a year
> >>> >> >>> A College Graduate makes 38,000 a year.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>Hopefully I'll be making a lot more than that.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Let's see....English degree....from a Georgia college....
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I've heard the midget talk - he can barely speak English.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > LOL yea too bad I wasn't on a "debate team" so I could defame my
> >>> > coach on a webpage five years later, right?
> >>>
> >>> MID and/or URL?
> >>
> >>
> >> It no longer exists.
> >
> > Mind you, I can research many dead URLs via archive.org. And so can
you.
>
> Dink research something? Fat f'n chance of that.
Idiot, he was responding to you, not me. You stated the URL didn't
exist,
he stated it was possible. And I've done more research in my time as a
student than you will in your entire pathetic lifetime.
>
> <snip Dink's revisionist history of events he has no clue about>
So because it's archived that doesn't mean anything right? Because
everything I wrote was true, since I wrote it, it has to be "revisionist"
right? Because it was on your website and is now archived in Google
Groups
that means I "have no clue" about it, right?
>
> >> or http://tinyurl.com/3fbla
> >
> > "Into the angry politico rock of Rage and the angst-pop of The
Smiths."
> >
> > "...whether he was pumping up Adam Sandler or pushing vibrators
against
> > bedroom doors of copulating couples, Chad was crying out. For love."
> >
> > *hee hee*
>
> Yes, Gancarski could be somewhat witty at times. It's too bad he lost
his
> courage to post here - he'd be much more entertaining for RSPW than Dink
> ever thought of being.
I notice you don't comment on anything that Gancarski was commenting ON.
Could that be because it's not really "revisionist?"
>
> >> ...of course, he will post some bullshit about how I'm lying or a
> >> midget or a redneck
> >
> > Or racist.
>
> I don't have to post anything about Dink being a racist - you can read
his
> racism for yourself right here:
- snip Chad obsession -
> > If *any* ot this is true, it's hilarious.
>
> In true Dink fashion, he takes a nugget of truth and wraps it in a
mountain
> of horseshit.
Hey genius -- they were YOUR words. Hello Richard Bullis, and how are
you
today?
|
