Karen,
I am impressed with your well reasoned and thoughtful responses. No it is
not. Wanna bet. Not all of us spawn.
An argument is not just a series of contradictions.
The fact is you are dealing with generalities and the law of averages.
Many
women does not mean all. When you average ALL salaries, you need to take
into account those women for whom work is not as big a priority as the
majority of men. Women who take time out of the workforce for children.
Women who will not relocate.
I understand this is a tough distinction for you. I do not expect you to
understand it.
"Karen M" <itskarenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:0af64794-f6bb-4539-8705-428fd757aaf5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 12, 7:06 pm, "madhatter" <rnv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Brian, you clearly would not understand the point if it hit you the
face.
I believe he does understand.
> Who gets paid more? Well on a whole men. But it has nothing to do with
> misogyny.
Of course it does.
>
> Many women do not compete at the same level as men in the workforce.
They
> will not relocate for their jobs.
Wanna bet?
> They leave work early to take care of the
> kids.
Not all of us need to do that.
> They take leaves of absence when their children are born.
Not all of us spawn.
> This is
> the biggest cause for a disparity in salary.
No, it's not.
> Generally, if a woman is
> dedicated to her job, she will do as better or better than most men.
No, she won't.
Well, she'll do the JOB as well as or better than her male
counterparts, but she'll still only be paid about 80% of what the men
make.
>
> You are an idiot.
If "getting it" is considered idiocy, then send in the idiots.
Karen
|
