BaJoRi wrote:
> "gilmae" <gilmaevski@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:44e31512$0$11973$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> BaJoRi wrote:
>>> Christ, it was bad. I wouldn't spend the money on it, so wasted two
hours
>>> of
>>> my time in a Barnes & Noble. If anything, this book made the other
three
>>> seem like Shakespeare. Severely disjointed, and oft-times
contradictory,
>>> the
>>> whole thing was just simply awful.
>>>
>>> And, for those of you eagerly anticipating reading this dreck, I will
>>> leave
>>> some space for the worst part:
>> For future reference, a larger spoiler space might have been nice for
>> those of us who skim.
>
> Sorry about that. I thought it as enough.
>
>
>> g. (the charming mr anti-afe :( )
>
>
I haven't really been a fan of the dreamers series from the beginning.
The stories seem to be drawn out with a lot of added "filler", making it
almost a chore reading the book. The series doesn't really show a lot of
imagination. That being said I can't really say I didn't enjoy reading
the books. I have been wondering where the Eddings' would go after
"their" previous series. I know that there are still people who believe
that they have always written together,but their latest series have hard
time measuring up which makes you wonder.....Anyhow, I enjoyed reading
the book thus far. It's not a literary masterpiece by any stretch of the
imagination, however it is not the worst book I have ever read, by any
means.
|
