Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Eddings > Re: The Subvers...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 10 Topic 278 of 376
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings

by Troels Forchhammer <Troels@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 1, 2006 at 08:16 PM

In message <news:0orvt11uq0eq1d4vie07q1u12gb81s0ket@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
William Marnoch <william@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> enriched us with: 
> 
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:31:17 GMT, Troels Forchhammer
> <Troels@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 

[Eriondia books rated "Christian Morality: Harmless/Dangerous". 
 
> Perhaps it means it is largely harmless but has a few dangerous
> elements. 

LOL!  'Mostly harmless' . . . 

>> tRoA, however, is given an unqualified "Dangerous" (I was also, as
>> one of the defenders of that book, thrilled to see it score 4/5 in
>> literary quality to opposee the 3/5 for the Eriondia books <G>). 
> 
> That makes no sense ;) 

Actually I think it does. Despite the plot-weaknesses (in particular 
with respect to the end) in tRoA, I think that it worked well to boil 
the plot down to one book. Literarily the tighter structure in tRoA is, 
IMO, an advantage. 

<snip> 

>> The other point I'm referring to is the natures of the two
>> prophecies -- they are not Good and Evil either, but rather
>> represent change vs. stasis. There's a nice passage (IDHTBIFOM) in
>> the Seeress of Kell as they're entering the cave where Belgarion
>> says something along the lines of 'It will change' to
>> Zandramas/the Dark Prophecy[*] where we get an exposition of this
>> philosophy. 
[...]
> 
> Unfortunately DE didn't really do the change vs. status argument
> justice. The 'dark' side was too obviously evil for it to be
> believable that it could possibly win. 

You are right. The side of 'dark' is very obviously evil, and that 
makes the moral 'message' (though I'm not sure it is a conscious 
message by the author) that as long as 'we' are 'better' than 'them', 
then everything's OK -- 'we' don't have to be 'good' on an absolute 
scale to justify our actions. 

I do think it's interesting, however, that DE doesn't invoke the usual 
good vs. evil language openly (though, as you say, he does do it 
implicitly -- half way, at least). I suppose that if one wishes, one 
can read any of half a dozen different 'messages' into that little fact 
:-) 

-- 
Troels Forchhammer
Valid mail is <t.forch(a)email.dk>

It is useless to meet revenge with revenge: it will heal nothing.
 - Frodo Baggins, 'LotR' (J.R.R. Tolkien)
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
The Subversiveness of Eddings
William Marnoch <willi  2006-01-18 00:15:47 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
MartinRJCarpenter <mau  2006-01-18 19:39:57 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
William Marnoch <willi  2006-01-19 00:23:36 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
"BB" <becnie  2006-01-18 20:46:05 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
William Marnoch <willi  2006-01-31 23:12:52 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
Troels Forchhammer <Tr  2006-01-19 09:31:17 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
William Marnoch <willi  2006-01-31 23:17:41 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
Troels Forchhammer <Tr  2006-02-01 20:16:26 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
"BaJoRi" <ba  2006-01-20 17:02:34 
Re: The Subversiveness of Eddings
"Aik" <arthu  2006-02-03 17:02:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 11:34:34 CST 2008.