Nexie wrote:
>Rock Drill wrote:
>> Saddam's execution is for one prime reason - to keep him silent so
>> that the US Government can more safely keep its dirty secrets about
>> their involvement with him and their implicit sup****t of the invasion
>> of Kuwait. Saddam was an evil man, but so are many people in power in
>> the world today.
>>
>> Bill Hicks was spot on with his likening of US policy to Jack Palance
>> throwing a gun to the feet of a villager and then saying 'Pick it
>> up....'
>>
>> The US contributed to the creation of the moster that Saddam became,
>> but there are far bigger monsters around, ones who use the media and
>> fear rather than gas to suppress the populace.
>>
>> It seems that our leaders follow the doctrines of Hitler, who said:
>>
>> "The great m***** of the people will more easily fall victims to a big
>> lie than to a small one."
>>
>> and
>>
>> "How fortunate for leaders that men do not think."
>>
>> All killing is obscene, whether at the hands of a terrorist or of the
>> state.
>
>Especially when the state is the terrorist.
>
>http://www.energybulletin.net/12125.html
>http://www.energybulletin.net/7707.html
>
>War on Terror or War on t'Euro? What price on life? If you consider the
>trillions of dollars at stake, a few thousand deaths at the World Trade
>Center (sic) must have looked pretty cheap to Hop-along Bush to ensure
>he had free reign to do what he liked.
>
>I wonder what would happen if Britain adopted the Euro? Probably
>nothing, if the US has a grip on Russia and China's oily short and
>curlies as well, what chance does our little nuclear-capable island have?
>
>I have never more fully appreciated the adage "One man's terrorist is
>another man's freedom fighter."
Those links arevery interesting. Thanks for those. I didn't realise
that the financial implications of oil being sold in anything other
than US dollars would be so catastrophic for the US.
If Britain adopted the Euro, it would hit some of the major oil
trading marketplaces, as these deals would be done in Euros. That is
why we didn't adopt the Euro - because the US didn't want us to.
Whilst we are busy ba****ng the US, I kind of like David Icke's
assertion that the (British) Virginia Company still actually owns the
US of A...
"In effect, the Virginia Company, the cor****ation headed by the
British Crown that controlled the 'former' colonies, simply changed
its name to the United States and other related pseudonyms. These
include the US, USA, United States of America, Wa****ngton DC, District
of Columbia, Federal Government and 'Feds'. The United States
Cor****ation is based in the District of Columbia and the current
president of the cor****ation is a man called George W. Bush. He is not
the president of the people or the country as they are led to believe,
that's just the smokescreen. This means that Bush launched a 'war on
terrorism' on behalf of a private cor****ation to further the goals of
that cor****ation. It had nothing to do with' America' or 'Americans'
because these are very different legal entities. It is the United
States Cor****ation that owns the United States military and everything
else that comes under the term 'federal'. This includes the Federal
Reserve, the 'central bank' of the United States, which is, in
reality, a private bank owned by controlling stockholders (and
controllers of the US Cor****ation) that are not eyen American.
This is the bank from which the United States Cor****ation borrows
'money'. The Federal Reserve was manipulated into existence in 1913
and dictates the United States interest rate that has a massive
knock-on effect on the rest of the world."
Icke may be barmy (especially 'the royal family are reptiles' theory)
but some of what he writes about makes a lot of sense. Maybe that
makes me barmy too, but I do think we are being misled on a massive
scale. And whatever happened on 9/11 possibly is one of the biggest
lies ever told, but it is nested in some even bigger lies...
Rock
|
