tadchem wrote:
> Even a desk calendar with only one page, which nobody ever flips, is
> right once a year.
Unless it is showing Feb 29th.
:)
> Davidovits and Barsoum present a fair case that the pyramids may have
> been built of reconstituted limestone (using limestone quarry debris,
> soda, salt, and water - and not using scarce trees for wheels or sleds
> or precious edible oil for lubricating runners).
>
> The chemistry should work. The Geopolymer Institute has published the
> results of analyses which show that not all pyramid limestone is
> "natural" limestone.
>
http://www.geopolymer.org/news/cutting-edge-analysis-proves-davidovits%E2%80%99-pyramid-theory
>
> This hypothesis, if proven out, would reassign the invention of
> concrete from the Romans to the Egyptians.
It is actually is very possible.
I just saw a show how they must have made some stuff to patch bad rock
to build the 4th pyramid...
The evidence of the stuff is still there too,
but that pyramid was apparently torn down by unknowns.
Only the base remains.
:(
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
|
