Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Dune > Re: worms
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 24 Topic 953 of 1062
Post > Topic >>

Re: worms

by Wild Monkshood <Wild_Monkshood@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 9, 2008 at 02:33 PM

Kieran Sanders wrote:

> SandChigger wrote:
> 
>> But there would still have to be humans on Arrakis (early settlers,
>> who later intermarried with the Fremen? If Leto has OM of the event,
>> it has to have come to him through Chani's bloodlines) to witness
>> whatever happened.
> 
> 
> Its always possible (though less fun to ponder) that he's not quoting 
> direct OM of the arrival of the sandtrout, but just echoing Grandpa 
> Kynes' understanding of what happened based on the evidence (dry seas, 
> ancient water erosion etc).
> 
> The worms could have arrived naturally - we don't know that much about 
> the life cycle - maybe sandtrout could survive a meteor ride.
> 
> Alternatively, Leto could just be wrong - they could have evolved in 
> some niche on Arrakis when it was a wet-world, then had a sudden 
> population explosion, expanding to fill the whole planet, giving the 
> appearance of a sudden arrival.

	I'm not saying it wasn't possible, but I think that as a reader I 
accept that FH was telling us that what Leto II was saying was a "fact". 
Sometimes it is hard to discern when the author is using his "Voice of 
God" about his creation and when he is inviting speculation/thought 
processes for the reader. I think that FH did indeed wish that this 
piece of data be accepted as for what he had determined to be true in 
his story.

WM
 




 24 Posts in Topic:
worms
"Tony" <tony  2008-01-30 18:31:06 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-01-31 12:36:20 
Re: worms
"Tony" <tony  2008-01-31 17:46:31 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-01-31 12:40:30 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-02-01 08:03:59 
Re: worms
"Tony" <tony  2008-02-01 18:09:22 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-02-01 22:13:12 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-02 09:33:08 
Re: worms
"Tony" <tony  2008-02-04 07:17:32 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-04 10:11:27 
Re: worms
"Tony" <tony  2008-02-04 11:49:53 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-02-02 16:49:42 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-02 22:45:08 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-02-02 22:49:36 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-03 03:26:02 
Re: worms
Dan Cline <paul_leto@[  2008-02-04 14:45:57 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-05 00:08:07 
Re: worms
Kieran Sanders <cypher  2008-02-05 09:41:30 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-05 10:29:13 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-02-09 08:59:14 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-09 12:48:36 
Re: worms
SandChigger <sandchigg  2008-02-09 09:08:31 
Re: worms
Kieran Sanders <cypher  2008-02-09 18:40:00 
Re: worms
Wild Monkshood <Wild_M  2008-02-09 14:33:07 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 9:12:17 CST 2008.