On Nov 8, 3:17 pm, JohnK <jken...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 6:03 pm, "Tony" <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > We all know how the sequels were written: not so good, if I may be so
bold
> > to say. But what do Dune fans wish the sequels were like? Is it a
good
> > idea to try to write a sequel based on limited information, and
lacking the
> > skills of the original author?
>
> Folks,
>
> To call the claptrap that pur****ts to be the prequels of the
> Chronicles "not so good" is being way to kind to what really should be
> called crap.
>
> I haven't posted to afd in over a year and here we are still
> discussing the validity of this tripe. WILL IT NEVER END?
>
> John
>
> PS I'm back!
I don't know how anyone familiar with the orignals can call the new
books anything but crap.
|
