by "Qazfez" <qazfez@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Nov 3, 2007 at 02:45 PM
"Bastard Toadflax" <bastard_toadflax@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e388$4729e057$6210290e$17705@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Qazfez wrote:
>
>> "Tony" <tony@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:r7WdnasmgJtuM7ranZ2dnUVZ_ternZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>Is it im****tant to consider the 60s when interpreting Dune?
>>
>>
>> What is there to interpret about 'Dune'? In what way is the book not
>> clear?
>
> Is this a joke?
No.
