der ****s are swell
>
>
>
> The Dixie ****s wrote:
> > Prof. Milton Goldblatt wrote:
> > > Key Reagan advisor Hon. Paul Roberts:
> > >
> > > "Gullible Americans have been duped by the 9/11 Hoax... Wise up --
the
> > > world is laughing at you."
> > >
> > > Who is Paul Craig Roberts?
> > > Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under Ronald
> > > Reagan (awarded the Treasury Department's Meritorious Service Award
f=
or
> > > "his outstanding contributions to the formulation of United States
> > > economic policy.")
> > > Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford
University,
> > > and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute.
> > > Former editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and
columnist
> > > for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service
> > > Held the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center
for
> > > Strategic and International Studies (1982 -1993)
> > > Distinguished Fellow at the Cato Institute from 1993 to 1996
> > > Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy
> > > Nationally syndicated columnist for Investor's Business Daily
> > > Winner of the 1992 Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism
> > > Ranked "One of the top seven journalists" by the Forbes Media Guide
> > > (1993)
> > > Author of, The Tyranny of Good Intentions, and Marx's Theory of
> > > Exchange, Alienation and Crisis
> > >
> > > Dr. Roberts was educated at the Georgia Institute of Technology (
> > > B.S.), the University of Virginia (Ph.D.), the University of
Californ=
ia
> > > at Berkeley and Oxford University where he was a member of Merton
> > > College.
> > >
> > > He is listed in Who's Who in America, Who's Who in the World , The
> > > Dictionary of International Biography, Outstanding People of the
> > > Twentieth Century, and 1000 Leaders of World Influence.
> > >
> > >
> > > Could anyone in their right mind consider this man a crackpot
> > > "conspiracy theorist"?
> > >
> > >
_____________________________________________________________________=
______
> > >
> > > Gullible Americans
> > >
> > > By Paul Craig Roberts
> > > Information Clearing House
> > > 08/14/06
> > >
> > >
> > > I was in China when a July Harris Poll re****ted that 50 percent of
> > > Americans still believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction
when
> > > Bush invaded that country, and that 64 percent of Americans still
> > > believe that Saddam Hussein had strong links with Al Qaeda.
> > >
> > > The Chinese leaders and intellectuals with whom I was meeting were
> > > incredulous. How could a majority of the population in an allegedly
> > > free country with an allegedly free press be so totally misinformed?
> > >
> > > The only answer I could give the Chinese is that Americans would
have
> > > been the perfect population for Mao and the Gang of Four, because
> > > Americans believe anything their government tells them.
> > >
> > > Americans never check any facts. Who do you know, for example, who
h=
as
> > > even read the Re****t of the 9/11 Commission, much less checked the
> > > alleged facts re****ted in that do***ent. I can answer for you. You
> > > don't know anyone who has read the re****t or checked the facts.
> > >
> > > The two co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission Re****t, Thomas Kean and
Lee
> > > Hamilton, have just released a new book, "Without Precedent: The
Insi=
de
> > > Story of the 9/11 Commission." Kean and Hamilton reveal that the
> > > commission suppressed the fact that Muslim ire toward the US is due
to
> > > US sup****t for Israel's persecution and dispossession of the
> > > Palestinians, not to our "freedom and democracy" as Bush
> > > propagandistically claims. Kean and Hamilton also reveal that the
US
> > > military committed perjury and lied about its failure to intercept
the
> > > hijacked airliners. The commission even debated referring the
> > > military's lies to the Justice Department for criminal
investigation.
> > > Why should we assume that these admissions are the only coverups and
> > > lies in the 9/11 Commission Re****t?
> > >
> > > How do you know that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist plot? How do you
kn=
ow
> > > that THREE World Trade Center buildings collapsed because TWO were
hit
> > > by airliners? You only "know" because the government gave you the
> > > explanation of what you saw on TV. (Did you even know that three WTC
> > > buildings collapsed?)
> > >
> > > I still remember the enlightenment I experienced as a student in
> > > Russian Studies when I learned that the Czarist secret police would
s=
et
> > > off bombs and then blame those whom they wanted to arrest.
> > >
> > > When Hitler seized dictatorial power in 1933, he told the Germans
that
> > > his new powers were made necessary by a communist terrorist attack
on
> > > the Reichstag. When Hitler started World War II by invading Poland,
=
he
> > > told the Germans that Poland had crossed the frontier and attacked
> > > Germany.
> > >
> > > Governments lie all the time--especially governments staffed by
> > > neoconservatives whose intellectual godfather, Leo Strauss, taught
th=
em
> > > that it is permissible to deceive the public in order to achieve
their
> > > agenda.
> > >
> > > Some readers will write to me to say that they saw a TV do***entary
or
> > > read a magazine article verifying the government's explanation of
9/1=
1=2E
> > > But, of course, these Americans did not check the facts either--and
> > > neither did the people who made the do***entary and wrote the
magazine
> > > article.
> > >
> > > Scientists and engineers, such as Clemson University Professor of
> > > Engineering Dr. Judy Woods and BYU Professor of Physics Dr. Steven
> > > Jones, have raised compelling questions about the official account
of
> > > the collapse of the three WTC buildings. The basic problem for the
> > > government's account is that the buildings are known to have fallen
at
> > > freefall speed, a fact that is inconsistent with the government's
> > > "pancaking" theory in which debris from above collapsed the floors
> > > below. If the buildings actually "pancaked," then each floor below
> > > would have offered resistance to the floors above, and the elapsed
ti=
me
> > > would have been much longer. These experts have also calculated
that
> > > the buildings did not have sufficient gravitational energy to
> > > accommodate the government's theory of the collapse. It is
certainly
> > > a known and non-controversial fact among physicists and engineers
that
> > > the only way buildings can collapse at freefall speed into their own
> > > footprints is by engineered demolition . Explosives are used to
remo=
ve
> > > the sup****t of floors below before the debris from above arrives.
> > > Otherwise, resistance is encountered and the time required for fall
> > > increases. Engineered demolition also explains the symmetrical
> > > collapse of the buildings into their own foot prints. As it is
> > > otherwise improbable for every point in floors below to weaken
> > > uniformly, "pancaking" would result in asymmetrical collapse as some
> > > elements of the floor would give sooner than others.
> > >
> > > Scientific evidence is a tough thing for the American public to
handl=
e,
> > > and the government knows it. The government can rely on people
> > > dismissing things that they cannot understand as "conspiracy
theory."
> > > But if you are inclined to try to make up your own mind, you can
find
> > > Dr. Jones' and Dr. Woods' papers, which have been formally presented
=
to
> > > their peers at scientific meetings, on line at
http://www.st911.org/
> > >
> > > Experts have also pointed out that the buildings' massive steel
> > > skeletons comprised a massive heat sink that wicked away the heat
from
> > > the limited, short-lived fires, thus preventing a heat buildup.
> > > Experts also point out that the short-lived, scattered,
low-intensity
> > > fires could barely reach half the melting point of steel even if
they
> > > burned all day instead of merely an hour .
> > >
> > > Don't ask me to tell you what happened on 9/11. All I know is that
t=
he
> > > official account of the buildings' collapse is improbable.
> > >
> > > Now we are being told another improbable tale. Muslim terrorists in
> > > London and Pakistan were caught plotting to commit mass murder by
> > > smuggling bottles of explosive liquids on board airliners in hand
> > > luggage. Baby formula, shampoo and water bottles allegedly contained
> > > the tools of suicide bombers.
> > >
> > > How do we know about this plot? Well, the police learned it from an
> > > "Islamic militant arrested near the Afghan-Pakistan border several
> > > weeks ago." And how did someone so far away know what British-born
> > > people in London were plotting?
> > >
> > > Do you really believe that Western and Israeli intelligence
services,
> > > which were too incompetent to prevent the 9/11 attack, can uncover a
> > > London plot by capturing a person on the Afghan border in Pakistan?
W=
hy
> > > would "an Islamic militant" rat on such a plot even if he knew of
it?
> > >
> > > More probable explanations of the "plot" are readily available.
> > > According to the August 11 Wayne Madsen Re****t, informed sources in
t=
he
> > > UK re****t that "the Tony Blair government, under siege by a Labor
Par=
ty
> > > revolt, cleverly cooked up a new 'terror' scare to avert the
public's
> > > eyes away from Blair's increasing political woes. British law
> > > enforcement, neocon and intelligence operatives in the US, Israel,
and
> > > Britain, and Rupert Murdoch's global media empire cooked up the
> > > terrorist plot, liberally borrowing from the failed 1995 'Oplan
Bjink=
a'
> > > plot by Pakistan- and Philippines-based terrorist Ramzi Ahmad
Yousef
> > > to crash 11 trans-Pacific airliners bound from Asia to the US."
> > >
> > > There are other plausible explanations. For example, our puppet in
> > > Pakistan decided to arrest some people who were a threat to him.
With
> > > Bush's commitment to "building democracy in the Middle East," our
> > > puppet can't arrest his political enemies without cause, so he lays
t=
he
> > > blame on a plot.
> > >
> > > Any testimony against Muslim plotters by "an Islamic militant" is
> > > certain to have been bought and paid for.
> > >
> > > Or consider this explanation. Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush and
> > > Blair are war criminals. Bush is so worried that he will be held
> > > accountable that he has sent his attorney general to consult with
the
> > > Republican Congress to work out legislation to protect Bush
> > > retroactively from his violations of the Geneva Conventions .
> > >
> > > Tony Blair is in more danger of finding himself in the dock.
Britain
> > > is signatory to a treaty that, if justice is done, will place Blair
> > > before the International Criminal Court in the Hague.
> > >
> > > What better justification for the two war criminals' illegal actions
> > > than the need to foil dastardly plots by Muslims recruited in sting
> > > operations by Western intelligence services? The more Bush and Blair
> > > can convince their publics that terrorist danger abounds, the less
> > > likely Bush and Blair are ever to be held accountable for their
crime=
s=2E
> > >
> > >
> > > But surely, some readers might object, our great moral leaders
wouldn=
't
> > > do something political like that!
> > >
> > > They most certainly would. As Joshua Micah Marshall wrote in the
July
> > > 7 issue of Time magazine, the suspicion is "quite reasonable" that
"t=
he
> > > Bush Administration orchestrates its terror alerts and arrests to
goo=
se
> > > the GOP's poll numbers."
> > >
> > > Joshua Micah Marshall proves his conclusion by examining the barrage
=
of
> > > color-coded terror alerts, none of which were real, and, yes, it all
> > > fits with political needs.
> > >
> > > And don't forget the plot unearthed in Miami to blow up the Sears
Tow=
er
> > > in Chicago. Described by Vice President Cheney as a "very real
threat=
,"
> > > the plot turned out to be nothing more than a few harmless whackos
> > > recruited by an FBI agent sent out to organize a sting.
> > >
> > > There was also the "foiled plot" to blow up the Holland Tunnel and
> > > flood downtown New York City with sea water. Thinking New Orleans,
t=
he
> > > FBI invented this plot without realizing that New York City is above
> > > sea level. Of course, most Americans didn't realize it either.
> > >
> > > For six years the Bush regime has been able to count on the ignorant
> > > and naive American public to believe whatever tale that is told
them.
> > > American gullibility has yet to fail the Bush regime.
> > >
> > > The government has an endless number of conspiracy theories, but
only
> > > people who question the government's conspiracies are derided for
> > > "having a conspiracy theory."
> > >
> > > The implication is even worse if we assume that the explosive bottle
> > > plot is genuine. It means that America and Britain by their own
> > > aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, and by enabling Israel's war
crim=
es
> > > in Palestine and Lebanon, have created such hatred that Muslims, who
> > > identify with Bush's, Blair's, and Israel's victims, are plotting
> > > retaliation.
> > >
> > > But Bush is prepared. He has taught his untutored public that "they
> > > hate us for our freedom and democracy."
> > >
> > > Gentle reader, wise up. The entire world is laughing at you.
> > >
> > >
> > > Shalom,
> > >
> > > --- Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. =AE **** u sand nigger
> > >
> > > http://www.prof.faithweb.com
> > > http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
> > > New Dr. Goldblatt's Message Board:
http://www.eboards4all.com/867960/
|
