Mike Flannigan wrote:
> "Leif Erikson" <jackball@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:LiWNg.7168$v%4.2364@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>l_muqtadir@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>
>>>alsandorz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Because Liberals score much lower on IQ tests than
>>>>>the population at large.
>>>>
>>>>Ad hominems? That's all you can come up with?
>>>
>>>
>>>No. An ad hominem attack would be me saying "alsandorz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is a
>>>piece of dog ****." Attributing Liberal behavior to Liberal stupidity
>>>is called correlating.
>>
>>The problem is the statement is not sup****ted. You have never seen
>>anything to sup****t your claim that "Liberals" [sic] socre lower on IQ
>>tests than the public at large.
>>
>>In fact, in my admittedly limited experience, liberals - I'm not one, so
>>don't take this as any kind of defence of contem****ary American
>>liberalism - generally seem *more* intelligent than either conservatives
>>or the population overall.
>
>
> Is that why they stupidly ask, "Ad hominem? That's all you can come up
> with?" when someone addresses an ad hominem attack in kind? Perhaps
you're
> not the sharpest knife in the drawer either, heh?
>
If you check out the exit polls from 2004, you will find that a majority
with education (MS, Ph.D., Professional degrees) higher than some or 4
years of college, voted Democrat. But so did people with HS education
or less.
What one can conclude? Half educated people are more susceptible to
manipulations, more dangerous than the ones got only minimal education.
|
