Re: Arthur Pendragon

True. But we can wish. I mean look at what happened with Spider Man and the
Hulk


>Subject: Re: Arthur Pendragon
>From: "Mark Brown" mark.brown@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>Date: 6/21/2004 11:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <40d70e9a_1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>"Blksafyre1978" <blksafyre1978@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:20040620230705.25561.00000377@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The history channel had a great 2 hour show about the legendary King
>Arthur
>> which even mentions his slumber on the fabled isle of Avalon. I was
always
>> curious about how a last name was developed for the character on
Gargoyles
>and
>> the whole story of Avalon in the first place. It was really interesting
>and
>> answered a lot of questions (and of course brought up a whole host of
new
>> ones). Can't wait until the King Arthur movie comes out.
>
>It looks good --I'm glad to see that they're using a more historic
version
>of Gwenfahr. She's a Pictish princess; a warrior who defends her crown by
>sword and strength, not the gilded lily of a trophy wife that latter
>storytellers turned her into.
>
>ARTHUR?: There're a lot of lonely men out there. . .
>GWEN: (long-suffering look) Don't worry; I won't let them touch you.
>
>> Speaking of movies...wonder if they would ever make a live action (kind
of
>like
>> X-men I guess) version of Gargoyles. What do you think?
>
>It'd be nice, though I'd think the window of op****tunity is past
>now --unless the DVD sales are truly stellar, Gargoyles is pretty much
>played out in Disney's eyes. Maybe in a few decades we'll get another
>nostalgia wave, and Gargoyles will merit a relaunch.
>
>Mark
>"Which could be good or bad, really."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>