On Apr 27, 6:48=A0pm, Mercellus Bohren <mercell...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 24, 5:57 pm, btpage0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 24, 1:40 pm,MercellusBohren <mercell...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 24, 12:31 pm, The BorgMan <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > ... but then I have no problem with the idea that
> > > > people should be able to kill themselves if they want, and even
use =
the
> > > > help of others to do so.
>
> > > With an attitude like that, you'll never be a good robot.
>
> > I can understand why someone would make a robot reference in reference
> > to something like the polygamist compound. =A0here it makes no sense.
> > You know I work with a lot of PhDs and every one of them have trouble
> > applying what is "reasonable" to their legal arguments.
>
> > It is not at all hard to see the harm in indulging "rape" fantasies.
> > Get real.
>
> > Brent
>
> But, still, he'll never make a good robot with that non-robotic
> attitude. I'm just saying. I mean, a robot is never supposed to help
> others harm themselves. It's, like, law #2 for robots I think.- Hide
quote=
d text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dang, I was in a bad mood last week. I totally missed the
references. That WOULD make for a bad robot.
Brent
|
