"lazarus" <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:elr170ht4aaj2l53i4482sa59kdfihqcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 04:00:43 GMT, "Venger" <Venger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >> But they all took them off every time the cameras were turned on,
> >> right?
> >
> >Dude the chemwar body suits were on ALL THE TIME, every unit entering
Iraq
> >went in MOPP 1. **** you are ignorant. They didn't wear the
hoods/gloves
> >UNLESS they were under attack from artillery or mortar rounds. Did you
think
> >they were going to strip ****d in the desert to put the pants and top
on?
> >There's no TIME you jackass. Every soldier and embed has their chemwar
> >uniform on BEFORE going into Iraq, and was requried to carry his full
MOPP
> >gear - hood, gloves, overboots. Didn't you even SEE any of the war
coverage?
> >
> >I'm sure they all did it because it was fun.
> >
> >Die troll. Stupid dick.
> >
> >Venger
> >
> >
>
> You don't strip ****d to put on chem gear. I spent many many hours in
> chem gear, never had to strip ****d once.
Spent hours in, but don't understand nor recognize the use of? Do you
dispute that all forces entering Iraq were MOPP 1? Your hours in MOPP gear
surely enables you to comment as an expert, so please do - dispute the
word
of everyone in the combat zone. You fail to address the real meat of the
statement, only the utterly inconsequential matter of exactly how much
clothing needs to be worn under your MOPP gear. So, get to it - I can
throw
a ton of links at you describing the troops in MOPP 1 condition entering
Iraq. What do you have besides a big bag of nothin'?
> You're really getting worked up about this, and yet you can't get even
> the most basic, simple facts straight. Pretty pathetic.
Were they in MOPP1 gear or not? Let people draw their own conclusions
about
who has their facts together as you fail to address the point - only to
worry about whether MOPP gear is put on when you are FULLY ****d, or just
down to your undergarments.
> But that's
> to be expected from a fan of a man who has to pay people to come watch
> his "show."
I guess if my position was exposed as false I too would detract from the
point and worry about Dennis Miller's audience or some other bit of
stupidity. Wait, no, I wouldn't.
Venger
|
