Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Dennis Miller > Kerry misquoted
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 49 of 50 Topic 173 of 241
Post > Topic >>

Kerry misquoted

by nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 19, 2004 at 06:16 PM

Anatomy of a Foul-Up  

By Liz Cox Barrett and Thomas Lang

In yesterday's New York Times, Jodi Wilgoren informed readers that "the
weeklong controversy" over Sen. John Kerry's "recent claim to have
international support" for his presidential bid stemmed from an imprecise
transcript of a March 8 Kerry fundraiser in Florida. The transcript was
provided to the press by the Boston Globe's Patrick Healy, one of the two
reporters permitted by the Kerry camp to cover the March 8th event. 

Healy now says that at the March 8 event Kerry said, "I've met more
leaders who can't go out and say it all publicly but boy they look at you
and say, you gotta win this ..." and not, as Healy originally reported to
the press corps and in his own piece, "I've met foreign leaders who can't
go out and say it all publicly but boy they look at you and say, you gotta
win this ..." (Emphasis ours in both cases.) On Monday, Healy emailed a
correction and an apology to the Kerry press corps inviting them all to
"feel free to hold me accountable to your editors and higher-ups." 

The Los Angeles Times and Boston Globe also ran stories yesterday which
included the correction. Reading the coverage of the misquote, Campaign
Desk had questions, including: Who was the other pool reporter at the
event and what did s/he hear Kerry say? Why were only two reporters
permitted into the event? 

So we called Patrick Healy to get more detail on what happened. Here's the
story behind the story, according to Healy.

Per ground rules recently worked out between the Kerry camp and the herd
of some forty reporters who follow it, March 8 was the first time
reporters were permitted inside a Kerry fundraising event. Because it was
a small affair -- just over fifty people, Healy says -- a "mini-pool" of
two reporters was allowed in rather than the full press pool which
typically numbers 15 or 16 reporters (along with several tape recorders
and a few TV cameras). Patrick Healy was the "print pooler" at the event
and Catherine Loper, a Fox News Channel political correspondent, was the
"TV pooler" who,  Healy says, did not record the event. (Neither Loper nor
the Kerry campaign  returned Campaign Desk's calls requesting comment). 

When the event ended, Healy and Loper discussed what they both thought
they heard Kerry say (that he'd "met foreign leaders") and wondered which
leaders Kerry was referring to. Healy "raced back to the bus where the
pool was." The Associated Press and Reuters reporters were especially
eager to get something out, so Healy listened to his tape and within
thirty minutes sent "a highlights email to the [press] pool" which
included the erroneous Kerry quote. The AP later that day ran this story,
including Kerry's "foreign leaders" quote at the end. In a press release
that day the Republican National Committee featured Kerry's "foreign
leaders" comment prominently with the headline, "John Kerry International
Man of Mystery III: Communist North Korea Only Government on Record
Supporting Kerry." 

That afternoon, Healy emailed the press pool a "partial transcript" of the
event in which he paraphrased a comment, made by Kerry's Florida finance
chair Milton Ferrell, that prompted Kerry's remarks about "foreign
leaders." In his own story the next day, Healy reported Kerry's statement
(and the RNC's North Korea crack) several paragraphs deep in his campaign
story (as did the New York Times).

When Secretary of State Colin Powell was presented with Kerry's "foreign
leaders" quote on "Fox News Sunday" last weekend and asked by Fox's Chris
Wallace to comment, Powell suggested Kerry name the "foreign leaders." On
the same day at a town hall meeting in Pennsylvania when Kerry was asked
which "foreign leaders" he was referring to, he disputed the wording of
the original quote but did not deny the premise. Kerry also declined to
name "foreign leaders" specifically, saying that he would not betray any
private conversations he'd had. Powell's words, combined with Kerry's
additional comments on Sunday, elevated the "foreign leaders" comment from
anecdotal aside to headline status in the Associated Press, the Boston
Globe and the New York Times, among other places.

Healy says that "given the amount of attention" the Kerry comment
eventually received, and given that Healy was "the only [reporter] who had
a tape of the exchange," he decided to revisit the recording Monday to
"get all of the context and write a full transcript of the exchange" so
that other reporters in the Kerry corps would have "as much context as
possible." (Pool reporters, Healy says, transcribe entire events if
they're "huge news events" but for this relatively small fundraiser he
initially offered the pool a transcription of "most of it.")

Reviewing the March 8 tape in the quiet of his own home Healy says he
realized that Kerry had said "more leaders" and not "foreign leaders."
Hence, Healy's mea culpa email Monday and yesterday's news reports on the
misreporting of Kerry's comments. 

Now for the misreporting on the misreporting of Kerry's comments. 

As yesterday's Boston Globe points out, human error compounded human
error. Although Healy, the Globe's own reporter, made the original
mistake, the Globe clarified that Kerry never (italics ours) "said he had
'met with' foreign leaders," as "some accounts have reported." Those
erroneous "accounts" began March 12, four days after the Florida
fundraiser, when the Washington Times ran a story by Charles Hurt and
Stephen Dinan that provided this doubly wrong version of Kerry's words
(italics ours): "I've met with foreign leaders who can't go out and say
this publicly ..." The "met with" version popped up on television again by
mid-day March 12 when CNN's Tucker Carlson repeated the error on
"Crossfire". Then this past weekend, on "Fox News Sunday," Chris Wallace
read Powell the incorrect "met with" version of the quote while the
correct version (at the time), "I've met foreign leaders," flashed on
screen for the viewer. The error found its way into print again in
Monday's Washington Post. 

The Washington Times continued to perpetuate this "met with" error
yesterday, even as it attempted to correct the record per Healy's e-mail.
In yesterday's paper, a story by Stephen Dinan and Joseph Curl stated,
"Mr. Healy yesterday sent an update to members of the traveling press
corps telling them that after listening to his tape of Mr. Kerry, he now
thinks the senator said he has 'met with more leaders,' not 'met with
foreign leaders.'"

As noted above, Healy actually wrote in his email that he had incorrectly
"heard" the words 'foreign leaders' rather than 'more leaders,'" and "am
certain that 'more leaders' is what Senator Kerry said." Additionally,
nowhere does Healy suggest that the word "with" -- as in "met with" --
belongs in the official record. 

For those of you still reading, in sum, what Kerry apparently said on
March 8 was, "I've met more leaders who ..." rather than "I've met with
foreign leaders who ..."

Healy is to be commended for making the effort to correct his initial
misquote. Will the Washington Times, Fox News Channel, CNN or the
Washington Post correct their misquotes of Healy's misquote? And might the
Kerry campaign rethink its pooling policies? Having several scribes
recording your every word can sometimes be useful. After all, reporters
are only human. 
-
? 2004 Columbia Journalism Revie



Alan

-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 **** Please use address alanh[at]min.net to reply via e-mail. ****

Posted using registered MR/2 ICE Newsreader #564 and eComStation 1.1

---------------------------------------------------------------------




 50 Posts in Topic:
studio audience
"Cubit" <no@  2004-03-14 16:05:36 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <Ve  2004-03-14 19:16:52 
Re: studio audience
"George Johnson"  2004-03-14 16:36:16 
Re: studio audience
DaveW <yzfr1ny@[EMAIL   2004-03-14 22:43:39 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-14 22:13:59 
Re: studio audience
"George Johnson"  2004-03-15 03:29:27 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-17 10:02:50 
Re: studio audience
"Ig" <a at a  2005-01-07 15:44:05 
Re: studio audience
"steve" <ste  2004-03-16 21:45:10 
Re: studio audience
stevehoran2001@[EMAIL PRO  2004-03-17 17:14:27 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-18 09:27:59 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-18 07:56:48 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <Ve  2004-03-18 17:15:39 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-18 10:02:39 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-18 12:42:18 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-18 17:44:36 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-18 20:35:11 
Re: studio audience
Terwilliger <Terwillig  2004-03-19 07:07:30 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <Ve  2004-03-27 21:41:58 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-28 22:06:17 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <Ve  2004-04-04 04:00:43 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-04-04 22:37:02 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <Ve  2004-04-11 00:06:16 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-19 20:41:24 
Re: studio audience
"Erasmus \"The   2004-03-19 00:14:08 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-18 18:01:00 
Re: studio audience
cpmomcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-03-18 16:12:48 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <Ve  2004-03-18 17:09:32 
Re: studio audience
cpmomcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-03-19 12:25:00 
Re: studio audience
Braun Howard <braunhow  2004-03-18 19:47:08 
Re: studio audience
stevehoran2001@[EMAIL PRO  2004-03-18 12:07:41 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-18 14:48:56 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-18 18:02:50 
Re: studio audience
"Erasmus \"The   2004-03-19 00:14:09 
Re: studio audience
stevehoran2001@[EMAIL PRO  2004-03-19 17:09:48 
Re: studio audience
W <yzfr1ny@[EMAIL PROT  2004-03-18 12:30:12 
Re: studio audience
stevehoran2001@[EMAIL PRO  2004-03-18 14:49:46 
Re: studio audience
"Venger" <ve  2004-03-18 18:36:34 
Re: studio audience
"stevehoran" &l  2004-03-18 19:36:59 
Re: studio audience
DaveW <yzfr1ny@[EMAIL   2004-03-19 20:52:15 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-19 20:56:36 
Re: studio audience
gzuckier@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-03-28 12:03:30 
Re: studio audience
gzuckier@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-03-19 00:26:58 
Re: studio audience
"anana" <j.r  2004-03-20 09:01:02 
Re: studio audience
lazarus <lazarus33pjf@  2004-03-22 05:42:02 
Re: studio audience
stevehoran2001@[EMAIL PRO  2004-03-22 11:02:10 
Re: studio audience
W <yzfr1ny@[EMAIL PROT  2004-03-14 22:42:26 
Re: studio audience
cpmomcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2004-03-15 11:50:44 
Kerry misquoted
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-03-19 18:16:28 
Re: studio audience
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2004-03-19 18:20:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 5 6:20:36 CDT 2008.