"lazarus" <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9vjk509sjck7sfqo16s62c53vv6acl5s6t@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:42:18 -0600, "Venger" <venger@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >> Thanks for admitting that Bush was wrong, though.
> >
> >Alright jerk, maybe you need to grab a copy of the Constitution.
Congress
is
> >EXPRESSLY given the power to declare war, which is why there was a VOTE
on
> >it. Every member of Congress was in charge. Don't let anything like a
FACT
> >get in your way. Your position is intellectually bankrupt.
>
> Congress abdicated their right,
They EXERCISED their power, stooge.
> giving it to Bush under the condition
> that he could show Iraq was an imminent threat.
This leftist meme has been repeatedly debunked. It's a crutch used by
those
on the wrong side of the war, who have to make arguments that somehow we'd
be better off with Hussein in power.
> Bush lied about that threat.
The 'Bush lied' bit - are you willing to assert that Clinton lied, Blair
lied, people with disparate political agendas from the President lied? Did
Rockefeller lie? Jane Harmon (kickass Democrat by the way, one of the few
genuine traditional Democrats left) lie? Did Evan Bayh (see Harmon, Jane)?
Did TED KENNEDY? You want Ted's quotes on what they had? He argued against
the war because he thought Iraq would chemwar our troops!
The Congress has intelligence committees that get the SAME MATERIAL as the
President. Everyone thought he had them. Do you think we outfitted all out
troops in hazmat gear as a joke?
> Bush lied, Powell lied, Cheney lied. Those are facts.
No, sir, they are politcal aspersions.
> >Bush and a nearly universal cohort appear to have incorrectly believed
> >Hussein had WMD. But it takes the seditious left to play the blame
game...
>
> Seditious? LOL. That's funny. Call us treasonous next. You know
> you want to.
Uh, sedition and treason are not synonymous, at least in their preferred
use.
Venger
|
