lazarus <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<1kpg309hnogjjp0hq2h7hpjf6av5jb9bhl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> On 21 Feb 2004 19:54:44 -0800, jodyenglish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(JE) wrote:
>
> >lazarus <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<cstc309k077k5ubmcqhm5d7974vpcdkdof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> >> On 18 Feb 2004 15:06:12 -0800, jodyenglish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(JE) wrote:
> >>
> >> >lazarus <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<mt7230ttjo0rl7rsc4hmlosl81mitgolsm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> >> >> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:32:55 -0600, "The Sentinel"
<Nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> Ritter referred
> >> >> >> to the war in Iraq as "illegitimate" and Miller
> >> >> >> got on his high horse and had a cow - to mix my
> >> >> >> barnyard metaphors. He got very self-righteous
> >> >> >
> >> >> >He was no more self-righteous than Ritter was, arguably less.
Ritter seems
> >> >> >to take any disagreement with himself very personally.
> >> >>
> >> >> Understandably, since he's been proven completely right, after
having
> >> >> his patriotism questioned previously.
> >> >
> >> >Maybe it's just me, but I don't generally tend to trust 40 yr old
men
> >> >who try to pick up teenage girls on the internet. Regardless of
> >> >resume.
> >>
> >> Maybe it's just me, but when the charges are dropped, and the case is
> >> sealed, only to be revealed when the person in question is saying
> >> things that the current administration doesn't want said, I get
> >> suspicious.
> >>
> >> Maybe it's just me, but when someone says something that later turns
> >> out to be true, I don't disbelieve it just because I don't like the
> >> person.
> >
> >
> >So do you think Ritter was set up? He has never actually denied the
> >allegations that I know of. And he also had a previous brush with the
> >law over luring teenage girls. And btw, I don't really care if there
> >are any WMD in Iraq.
>
> He was never convicted. The charges were not only dropped, the case
> was sealed.
>
O.J. wasn't convicted in a criminal court either.....the point is, I
looked around the neet to see if I could see somewhere Ritter denying
the charges. He never does. So I think he did it. Now did they monitor
him a little closer due to his anti Iraq crusades? Probably, but they
can't catch you doing something if you're doing nothing. So lets just
agree he did it.
> It was then mysteriously unsealed just enough to have the information
> leaked at just the right time to discredit him when he was saying
> things the Bush administration didn't want said.
>
> Things that later turned out to be completely accurate.
>
> So it doesn't matter if he was "set up" or not. He wasn't convicted.
> And the fact that he was even investigated was only leaked when he was
> discommoding the administration, illegally. Not the last time the
> information was illegally leaked to discredit or harm or threaten
> someone who was saying something the administration didn't like.
> Valerie Plame sound familiar?
>
> And, btw, you shouldn't care so much about the WMD in Iraq as you
> should the liars in the White House.
Weapons or not in Iraq I dont care....... I'll take the liars in the
White House now over the liars in the previous White House. It's gonna
be another glorious four years watching you loonies.
|
