lazarus <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<cstc309k077k5ubmcqhm5d7974vpcdkdof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> On 18 Feb 2004 15:06:12 -0800, jodyenglish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(JE) wrote:
>
> >lazarus <lazarus33pjf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<mt7230ttjo0rl7rsc4hmlosl81mitgolsm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> >> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:32:55 -0600, "The Sentinel"
<Nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Ritter referred
> >> >> to the war in Iraq as "illegitimate" and Miller
> >> >> got on his high horse and had a cow - to mix my
> >> >> barnyard metaphors. He got very self-righteous
> >> >
> >> >He was no more self-righteous than Ritter was, arguably less.
Ritter seems
> >> >to take any disagreement with himself very personally.
> >>
> >> Understandably, since he's been proven completely right, after having
> >> his patriotism questioned previously.
> >
> >Maybe it's just me, but I don't generally tend to trust 40 yr old men
> >who try to pick up teenage girls on the internet. Regardless of
> >resume.
>
> Maybe it's just me, but when the charges are dropped, and the case is
> sealed, only to be revealed when the person in question is saying
> things that the current administration doesn't want said, I get
> suspicious.
>
> Maybe it's just me, but when someone says something that later turns
> out to be true, I don't disbelieve it just because I don't like the
> person.
So do you think Ritter was set up? He has never actually denied the
allegations that I know of. And he also had a previous brush with the
law over luring teenage girls. And btw, I don't really care if there
are any WMD in Iraq.
|
