Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind

mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>In article <486a6295.527027250@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> linder.one@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote:
>
>> mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article 
>> ><bba6199a-0b05-4e18-b990-e6990d1f19d9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > Stevie Nichts <nix2nichts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Jun 30, 11:19 am, Jeffrey Turner <jtur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> > Ernst Blofeld wrote:
>> >> > > On Jun 29, 8:44 am, Jeffrey Turner <jtur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >>>Because, you know, anyone against affirmative action and quota
hiring
>> >> > >>>is also a racist and against civil rights.
>> >> >
>> >> > >>>And thus you quickly prove the point I was making.
>> >> >
>> >> > >>What is the conservative approach, other than to say, "Tut tut,
that 
>> >> > >>is
>> >> > >>a problem"?
>> >> >
>> >> > > Um, not discriminating on the basis of race?
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh right, pretending there is no problem.  Gotcha.
>> >> 
>> >> I thought the standard was judging a person by the content
>> >> of his character, and not by the color of his skin. Has that
>> >> notion been wholly abandoned by the left?
>> >
>> >so if we compare the color of skin in a large enough company
>> >should or should it not match the population as a whole?
>> 
>> No...not really.  I woud be suprised if it did.  Do you think it
>> should?
>> 
>> >
>> >if it does not should that imply anything?
>> 
>> No.  Should it?
>
>that youre a liar

I see...

I really didn't think you could defend your position....I was correct.

JSL