Re: Of Heller, the left, and civil liberties

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:17:27 -0700, 4114 Dead <zeppp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:42:56 -0700 (PDT), Stevie Nichts
><nix2nichts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Jun 28, 2:32 pm, 4105 Dead <zepp22114...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:23:23 -0700 (PDT), Stevie Nichts
>>> <nix2nic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> >One of the more interesting aspects of Heller is what it
>>> >reveals about the canard that only liberals care about
>>> >civil liberties and individual rights:
>>> >---
>>>
>http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_06_22-2008_06_28.shtml#121458...
>>>
>>> >The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,
>>> >upholding the Second Amendment right of individuals to own
>>> >firearms, should finally lay to rest the widespread myth that the
>>> >defining difference between liberal and conservative justices is
>>> >that the former sup****t "individual rights" and "civil liberties,"
>>> >while the latter routinely defer to government assertions of
>>> >authority. The Heller dissent presents the remarkable spectacle
>>> >of four liberal Supreme Court justices tying themselves into an
>>> >intellectual knot to narrow the protections the Bill of Rights
>>> >provides. Or perhaps it's not as remarkable as we've been led
>>> >to think.
>>> >---
>>>
>>> >These newsgroups abound with recent posts by certain
>>> >liberals who favor certain restrictions of civil liberties -- for
>>> >American citizens, anyway.
>>>
>>> How's your love affair with aboli****ng the fourth amendment coming
>>> along, Stevie?
>>
>>And, of course, that's all you lot have: finding yourself
>>unable to dispute the facts, you resort to the usual
>>ineffective tactic of waving your hands.
>
>Nah, that's just my disgust for strutting, posturing, bloviating and
>totally ineffective gun ****s ****ning through.

Ahhh, there's Zepp's real sentiments concerning the recent SCOTUS
decision ****ning through....