Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind

In article
<fd1f3c57-7c13-4145-a107-7d63138a0662@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Stevie Nichts <nix2nichts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Jun 30, 8:10 pm, mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > In article 
> > <bba6199a-0b05-4e18-b990-e6990d1f1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  Stevie Nichts <nix2nic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Jun 30, 11:19 am, Jeffrey Turner <jtur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > Ernst Blofeld wrote:
> > > > > On Jun 29, 8:44 am, Jeffrey Turner <jtur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>Because, you know, anyone against affirmative action and quota 
> > > > >>>hiring
> > > > >>>is also a racist and against civil rights.
> >
> > > > >>>And thus you quickly prove the point I was making.
> >
> > > > >>What is the conservative approach, other than to say, "Tut tut,
that 
> > > > >>is
> > > > >>a problem"?
> >
> > > > > Um, not discriminating on the basis of race?
> >
> > > > Oh right, pretending there is no problem.  Gotcha.
> >
> > > I thought the standard was judging a person by the content
> > > of his character, and not by the color of his skin. Has that
> > > notion been wholly abandoned by the left?
> >
> > so if we compare the color of skin in a large enough company
> > should or should it not match the population as a whole?
> 
> Ah, yes: the canard that equality of results trumps
> equality of op****tunity. What did MLK think of that, anyway?

how do you demonstrate equality of op****tunity
if the results are not

mlk is dead

arf meow arf - raggedy ann and andy for president and vice
limp and spineless lint for brains is  better yet and nice
then rueing pair of shrub and dick the republican lice
call me desdenova seven seven seven seven seven seven