Re: Of Heller, the left, and civil liberties

On Jun 30, 7:42=A0pm, Stevie Nichts <nix2nic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2:32=A0pm, 4105 Dead <zepp22114...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:23:23 -0700 (PDT), Stevie Nichts
> > <nix2nic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >One of the more interesting aspects of Heller is what it
> > >reveals about the canard that only liberals care about
> > >civil liberties and individual rights:
> > >---
> >
>http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_06_22-2008_06_28.shtml#121458..=
..
>
> > >The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,
> > >upholding the Second Amendment right of individuals to own
> > >firearms, should finally lay to rest the widespread myth that the
> > >defining difference between liberal and conservative justices is
> > >that the former sup****t "individual rights" and "civil liberties,"
> > >while the latter routinely defer to government assertions of
> > >authority. The Heller dissent presents the remarkable spectacle
> > >of four liberal Supreme Court justices tying themselves into an
> > >intellectual knot to narrow the protections the Bill of Rights
> > >provides. Or perhaps it's not as remarkable as we've been led
> > >to think.
> > >---
>
> > >These newsgroups abound with recent posts by certain
> > >liberals who favor certain restrictions of civil liberties -- for
> > >American citizens, anyway.
>
> > How's your love affair with aboli****ng the fourth amendment coming
> > along, Stevie?
>
> And, of course, that's all you lot have: finding yourself
> unable to dispute the facts, you resort to the usual
> ineffective tactic of waving your hands.

The image of his jumping belly doing the Vertical Wave is a bit too
much
to be endured. ;-)