Re: A policy that all Republicans can get behind

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:07:05 -0400, Steve <stevencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:52:26 -0700, 4095 Dead
><zepp22114095@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:06:31 -0700 (PDT), gjohns01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Just watch usenet Republicans come to the defense of this policy.
>>>
>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/wa****ngton/24cnd-justice.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
>>>
>>>    Justice Department officials over the last six years illegally
>>>used "political or ideological" factors to hire new lawyers into an
>>>elite recruitment program, tapping law school graduates with
>>>conservative credentials over those with liberal-sounding resumes, a
>>>new re****t found Tuesday.
>>>
>>>    The blistering re****t, prepared by the Justice Department’s
>>>inspector general, is the first in what will be a series of
>>>investigations growing out of last year’s scandal over the firings of
>>>nine United States attorneys. It appeared to confirm for the first
>>>time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics
>>>who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized
>>>during the Bush administration.
>>>
>>>    "Many qualified candidates" were rejected for the department’s
>>>honors program because of what was perceived as a liberal bias, the
>>>re****t found. Those practices, the re****t concluded, "constituted
>>>misconduct and also violated the department’s policies and civil
>>>service law that prohibit discrimination in hiring based on political
>>>or ideological affiliations."
>>
>>I posted it earlier.  Not one response.
>>
>>In their cowardice, they are quite adept at ignoring articles that
>>they don't like--and these days, that's most of them.
>
>
><LOL>  It's just that nobody really cares what *YOU* post Fatty.

Yes, why, obviously nobody cares...

http://news.google.com/news?svnum=10&as_scoring=r&hl=en&ned=us&aq=f&q=justice+hiring+probe
<253 major news stories and counting>

....right, you stupid mother****er?

Congratulations, you stupid mother****er, on so conclusively demonstrating
his point.

Obviously you will, indeed, go to great lengths to ignore FACTS that
displease your stupid goober ass.

BTW, best to cut back on the supplements, genius. Such high levels of
irony
in the blood can be dangerous to your sanity.

Oops! Too late...


---
The Metterling List

List No. 5 

6 under****rts 

6 shorts 

6 handkerchiefs 

has always puzzled scholars, principally because of the total absence of
socks. 

 -The Collected Laundry Lists of Hans Metterling, Vol. I, 437 pp., plus
xxxii-page introduction; indexed; $18.75, 
Venal & Sons