On Jan 30, 10:51=EF=BF=BDam, Nick...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:52:38 -0800 (PST), Stevie Nichts
>
>
>
>
>
> <nix2nic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Jan 29, 8:44?am, Nick...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:19:01 -0800 (PST), Stevie Nichts
>
> >> <nix2nic...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >Nick...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> >> >> I've heard the re-runs of everything Clinton said---and
> >> >> found nothing anyone could possible call "over the
> >> >> line"
>
> >> >> What IS over the line---is the stupidity of believing
> >> >> that Obama is credible.
>
> >> >Then there are the many who believe that neither
> >> >is particularly credible.
>
> >> Sure, and we call them loser republicans.
>
> >The NY Times editorial board consists of Republicans?
>
> Are you now suggesting that the NYT is credible? (
> about anything)
>
> How is it that you can call the NYT "not credible",
> then turn around and say it is?
When did I say the NYT is "not credible"?
> You don't see a problem there?
That would depend on whether you know what you're
on about.
|
