"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:FvydnWs5-MBMNI3VnZ2dnUVZ_s-pnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hybrid Angel/Messenger wrote:
>> "Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:z_udnSQ3KeKUMJbVnZ2dnUVZ_sSlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>David St. Albans wrote:
>>>
>>
>> <<<SNIP a majority of Alban's poop>>>
>>
>>>>So if Hybrid wants to continue his fallacious arguments, so be it.
>>>>Have fun. But it is all specious garbage.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Saint
>>>
>>>
>>>Sorry, so far there is no viable scientific evidence that human and
>>>neanderthal are anything but as described in Genesis (despite the OP's
>>>slightly inaccurate evaluation of the Genesis text).
>>
>>
>> They are NOT described in Genesis.....they are implied...
>>
>> Not imp lied.....
>>
>> OP? What is an OP? Me obviously....
>>
>> What is my 'slight'?.......
>>
>> 'Cain knew his wife.....?'
>>
>> The Neanderthal DIDN'T end up in Northern Israel....?
>>
>> This is wrong.....?
>> http://www.livescience.com/health/061115_neanderthal_dna.html
>>
>> what what WHAT.....is an OP & my slight......?
>>
>>
>>>Genome sequencing is a clear marker only when one understands
>>>that similarity is not the ultimate indicator but difference no matter
>>>how slight is.
>>
>>
>> Yah.....our similarity in physical and mental attributes....99.5%+
>> We essentially live their lifestyle.......
>>
>> ..../.5%....some scientists say /.1%...difference..... .99.9%.....
>>
>> A slight difference that makes a HUGE difference....in intelligence...
>>
>> Take that Atheists.....NyaNya.....Nya....NyaNya.....
>>
>> <And an Archie Bunker BIG....RASPBERRY....Ahhhhhh! All over the
>> monitor.> Oh ****! I destroyed a 19" Sony by hitting the screen with
>> my finger nail. This is a 22" Westinghouse. American Made...
>>
>> Can it be saved.....?
>>
>> I'll keep you apprised.....
>>
>> Yes....it's fine....thank you all for waiting.....
>>
>>>
>>>If atheist evolutionists didn't obsess so on proving that God doesn't
>>>exist they might get a clearer picture of how science works. In this
>>>regard you may benefit from reading some Kuhn:
>>>http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Kuhn.html
>>
>>
>> Great do***ent...in My Favorites....
>>
>> I like these so far...
>>
>> Chapter VII - Crisis and the Emergence of Scientific Theories.
>>
>> Yeah...ours is brand spanking new....
>>
>> Chapter X - Revolutions as Changes of World View.
>>
>> Yes....again.....ours would put ALL organized and unorganized
>> Gods.....down the toilet......
>>
>>
>>>Chapter XII - The Resolution of Revolutions.
>>
>>
>>>How do the proponents of a competing paradigm convert the entire
>>>profession
>>>or the relevant subgroup to their way of seeing science and the world?
>>>What
>>>causes a group to abandon one tradition of normal research in favor of
>>>another? What is the process by which a new candidate for paradigm
>>>replaces
>>>its predecessor?
>>
>>
>> Reason, rationality, logic....using common sense....I would think.....
>>
>> That's what I use.....
>>
>> My four food group for learning, the rules of thinking......
>>
>> Are you in genetics, Roy Jose Lorr.....?
>>
>> The only 'voice' of reason I've 'heard' so far.....
>>
>> ~>
>> Twonky....
>>
>> Hybrid Angel/Messenger.....
>>
>> An alien, in your two dimensional monitor, into
>> your two dimensional psyche.....
>>
>> Search COMETA Two D.....
>>
>> Bring yourself to .....3D.....
>>
>> And maybe 4/5/6 D....
>>
>> There are 'things' in and beyond your universe, HaShem's
>> "Natural Creation"....
>>
>> You ****s.....<you know who you are>.....renamed it.....!
>>
>> To a man made 'universe'.......<it doesn't deserve a 'cap U'.....>
>>
>> It deserves a....**** U.......!
>>
>> You denying pathetic Atheists....et....al, need a WAKEUP call!
>> Hey....that rhymes....."I'm a poet, and don't even know it....".
>> As the saying goes.......
>>
>> See you in your reply, Lorr......I hope....
>>
>> Idiot or Genius? Certainly not 'normal' intelligent thinking....
>>
>> NOBODY has come up with such a "paradigm".....
>
> Your post interests me but in truth, I can't tell when you're being,
> funny, sarcastic or serious.
I can't either....
But whatever I say....has been researched. And some originality
.....that's not a bad thing....
I see your sincerity.....
> The one bit I can make appropriate sense of and so feel confident in
> answering is when you say: " Reason, rationality, logic....using common
> sense....I would think..... That's what I use..... My four food group
for
> learning, the rules of thinking......" My response is: reason lies,
with
> good reason.
'lies'......in what context.....?
'Occupy a certain relative position'.....is the only
relative one....
I hope that is the case....
Forgive me if you think I'm being.....unreasonably
reasonable......
Now....would you like to get serious about the paradigm?
Go global debate...
I call it a philosophy.....
It's nice to know.....it's much more than that......
|
