"Roy Jose Lorr" <kenthz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:z_udnSQ3KeKUMJbVnZ2dnUVZ_sSlnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> David St. Albans wrote:
>
<<<SNIP a majority of Alban's poop>>>
>
> > So if Hybrid wants to continue his fallacious arguments, so be it.
> > Have fun. But it is all specious garbage.
>>
>>
>> Saint
>
>
> Sorry, so far there is no viable scientific evidence that human and
> neanderthal are anything but as described in Genesis (despite the OP's
> slightly inaccurate evaluation of the Genesis text).
They are NOT described in Genesis.....they are implied...
Not imp lied.....
OP? What is an OP? Me obviously....
What is my 'slight'?.......
'Cain knew his wife.....?'
The Neanderthal DIDN'T end up in Northern Israel....?
This is wrong.....?
http://www.livescience.com/health/061115_neanderthal_dna.html
what what WHAT.....is an OP & my slight......?
> Genome sequencing is a clear marker only when one understands
> that similarity is not the ultimate indicator but difference no matter
> how slight is.
Yah.....our similarity in physical and mental attributes....99.5%+
We essentially live their lifestyle.......
...../.5%....some scientists say /.1%...difference..... .99.9%.....
A slight difference that makes a HUGE difference....in intelligence...
Take that Atheists.....NyaNya.....Nya....NyaNya.....
<And an Archie Bunker BIG....RASPBERRY....Ahhhhhh! All over the
monitor.> Oh ****! I destroyed a 19" Sony by hitting the screen with
my finger nail. This is a 22" Westinghouse. American Made...
Can it be saved.....?
I'll keep you apprised.....
Yes....it's fine....thank you all for waiting.....
>
>
> If atheist evolutionists didn't obsess so on proving that God doesn't
> exist they might get a clearer picture of how science works. In this
> regard you may benefit from reading some Kuhn:
> http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Kuhn.html
Great do***ent...in My Favorites....
I like these so far...
Chapter VII - Crisis and the Emergence of Scientific Theories.
Yeah...ours is brand spanking new....
Chapter X - Revolutions as Changes of World View.
Yes....again.....ours would put ALL organized and unorganized
Gods.....down the toilet......
>Chapter XII - The Resolution of Revolutions.
>How do the proponents of a competing paradigm convert the entire
profession
>or the relevant subgroup to their way of seeing science and the world?
What
>causes a group to abandon one tradition of normal research in favor of
>another? What is the process by which a new candidate for paradigm
replaces
>its predecessor?
Reason, rationality, logic....using common sense....I would think.....
That's what I use.....
My four food group for learning, the rules of thinking......
Are you in genetics, Roy Jose Lorr.....?
The only 'voice' of reason I've 'heard' so far.....
~>
Twonky....
Hybrid Angel/Messenger.....
An alien, in your two dimensional monitor, into
your two dimensional psyche.....
Search COMETA Two D.....
Bring yourself to .....3D.....
And maybe 4/5/6 D....
There are 'things' in and beyond your universe, HaShem's
"Natural Creation"....
You ****s.....<you know who you are>.....renamed it.....!
To a man made 'universe'.......<it doesn't deserve a 'cap U'.....>
It deserves a....**** U.......!
You denying pathetic Atheists....et....al, need a WAKEUP call!
Hey....that rhymes....."I'm a poet, and don't even know it....".
As the saying goes.......
See you in your reply, Lorr......I hope....
Idiot or Genius? Certainly not 'normal' intelligent thinking....
NOBODY has come up with such a "paradigm".....
|
