"Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X> wrote in message
news:uvGdndz8XcQw45TVnZ2dnUVZ_saknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:i0di049t146r9n2a0af84rqnn3qh3mk82e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:44:26 -0400, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:lmba045ghrvqih2056p9jec32q2hbqpgg0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:50:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:9n1uv3hsc2ouqqa1s7f3hg54g4av0gcuqh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:41:36 -0400, the following appeared in
>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>.....I shove science at you all the time...
>>>>>>>Like genetics.....you reject it, all of the time.......
>>>>
>>>>>> You don't push science, since it's obvious from your posts
>>>>>> that you're scientifically illiterate.
>>>>
>>>>>In some fields yes. Just like you......
>>>>
>>>> But unlike you, I don't make pronouncements in fields in
>>>> which I'm illiterate. For you, that would be biology.
>>>
>>>Just genomes....
>>>
>>>Following the Biblical ancestral line...and how it runs right
>>>into us......intelligent, modern humans......
>>>>
>>>>>Are we, or are we not, 99.5%+ Neanderthal genome.....?
>>>>>Don't give me the bull**** of common ancestor. You can't
>>>>>produce one......
>>>>
>>>> Like I said, scientifically illiterate.
>>>
>>>Different sciences.....evidently the one in which you're not
>>>literate....
>>>
>>>> Thanks for confirming. Since we share 98% of our DNA with
>>>> chimps does that mean we interbred with them?
>>>
>>>More like 95% Chimp.....check it out. New technology....
>>>And it shows we are more like, 99.9% Neanderthal....
>>
>> OK, Sparky, what percentage indicates that there was
>> cross-breeding?
>
> 99.5%+ Neanderthal genome....
>
>> You can't write a check for "some value between $95 and
>> $99.90", so lets have an exact figure. And then produce
>> evidence (not more claims) that the figure is accurate. Good
>> luck on that...
>
> It means the 99.5%+ may hit the 99.9%....mark, as I saw on a
> History Channel series about the Neanderthals.....99.9%....
>
> The 99.5% is an absolute. But...it may be higher. We'll find out....
>
> That 95% is for the Chimp in us.......
>>
>>>OUCH...huh.....?
>>
>> Nope, just further confirmation that you're ignorant.
>
> Ignorant of what? A common ancestor? Tell me who/what
> it is? I would think, it would be the Neanderthal......
>>
>>>Praise HaShem.....
>>>
>>>If Muslims are always praising Allah, just before they blow
>>>up themselves, and innocents, I'll praise HaShem for my
>>>Wisdom.....
>>
>> If HaShem was responsible for the level of wisdom you
>> display here HaShem has a lot to answer for...
Who else ever saw the 'dust of the earth' as being, "the minerals
of the earth.....?" I never heard that before....
"Aks, and you shall recieve."
http://www.ask.com/web?q=%22man+was+made+from+the+dust+of+the+earth%22&search=&qsrc=0&o=0&l=dir
Didn't find 'minerals' anywhere.....
I've heard; "Take your vitamins and minerals today."
Praise HaShem.....
We don't wor****p Him, nor the Christ, nor the angels....
And they don't wor****p us....
Astiabo Chika Pranost Ti Ti Zazamu Logos HaShem
>
> Enough wisdom to challenge Darwin, who never addressed
> the 'intelligence' quotient.....
>
> You guys know it doesn't evolve.....
>>
>>>>Since we share 40% of our DNA with flatworms does that
>>>>mean we interbred with them?
>>>
>>>Ahhh...you've been doing your homework......
>>
>> Er, no, it's a fairly commonly-known figure.
>
> Bull****. That is NOT common knowledge....figure nor type....
>>
>>>Of course not. It doesn't mean we interbred with flatworms.
>>>It means the genes are present. How did the genes get there?
>>
>> We share a common ancestor, and genetics is very
>> conservative.
>
> And what is that common ancestor........?
>>
>>>The Neanderthal. We are the genetic sewer they were.......
>>>eXcept for .5 or 1%...of our genome.....
>>
>> You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
>
> Yes I do....that was supposed to be, .1%......sorry....
>>
>>>>How about bananas; we share DNA with them too.
>>>>Or are all those somehow "different"?
>>>
>>>And you use that gene to think......you are dominant fruit.
>>>
>>>I know that we have them all. We ARE a genetic sewer....
>>
>> You're an idiot, but I suspect it has more to do with
>> gullibility than genetics.
>
> Yeah, you're an evolved fruit cake....
>>
>>>Keep up with things in genetics will you please. It would
>>>make my life easier. You would have too agree.....
>>
>> This from an idiot who thinks there's some magic percentage
>> (between 95% and 99.9%, using TwonkyWorld figures) of shared
>> genes that "proves" interbreeding occurred...
>
> With genetics, each % / .%, makes a huge difference.....
>
> 99.5%+ Neanderthal. The highest of any sewerage in us.....
> Called 'dominant'. Makes us what we are, when mixed with
> intelligence.....
>
> We still live and die like our former selves.....but we do it,
> being smart....
>
> We could never believe there are immortal beings.....!
> One is an idiot for thinking such things.....right, Bob....?
>
> Even though we know stem cells and a 'longevity' gene ****tend
> immortality. Genetics, the stuff of Almighty God!
>>
>>>> BTW, regarding "You can't produce one......" please see a
>>>> couple of comments below regarding things *you* can't
>>>> produce. And we *do* have sufficient evidence from the
>>>> fossil record to show a common ancestor, just not the "most
>>>> recent" common ancestor. Your refusal to accept (or even
>>>> examine without prejudice) the evidence isn't anyone's
>>>> problem but yours.
>>>
>>>Until you find your missing link, shut the **** up...
>>
>> Your belief that the "missing link" is more than
>> journalistic hype confirms again your illiteracy in this
>> field. Thanks for the added data point.
>
> Journalistic hype? Because you have a missing link, I'm
> illiterate?
>
> Well....where is it? Your missing link? I think it's in Cain....
>>
>>>That missing link, is so the truth, stays missing.....
>>>
>>>The truth that intelligence comes from the gene of a parent!
>>
>> And yet more errors; genetics is part of intelligence, but
>> only part. I'm surprised (not) that in your expertise (not)
>> you were unaware of this.
>
> The parental gene dictates the intelligence. Totally separate
> from evolution.....
>>
>>>What does the do for Darwin's evolution......?
>>
>> What do *you* think it does?
> (I hate when I do that when editing.)
>
> I think it puts Darwin down the toilet....
> Evolution for physical traits maybe, but not intelligence....
>
> He just pointed out brain sizes.....
>
> The Neanderthal were around for 700,000 years and never
> got any smarter, nor prettier......until, "Cain knew his wife."
>
>> Do you think that any offspring is incapable of mating
>> with its immediate ancestors? If so, that's yet *more*
>> confirmation of your ignorance.
>
> Seth did it, by inbreeding with his brother's offspring.....
>
> The parental gene dictates the intelligence. It DOES
> NOT evolve! It learns to it's capacity....
>>
>>>>>If we didn't evolve from them, then Cain interbred with them.
>>>>
>>>> Produce Cain. Oh, you can't? Imagine that...
>>>
>>>See my "Aquarian Enlightenment" Post....
>>
>> No. Address the issue, which *you* brought up.
>
> Which is what? Did I do it here.....?
>>
>>>>>Simple......
>>>>
>>>> Yep, for anyone who thinks in sound bites.
>>>
>>>It's a straight line of ancestry and genetic engineering, dummy.
>>
>> Is it? Be so good as to expand on this, particularly the
>> "genetic engineering" part. Was genetic engineering of
>> humans common at the time of the mythical Cain?
>
> That's all it was. At the time of Cain. The new species 'Adam'
> was borne without using a womb. Dust/minerals of the earth
> and anything else done in a Petri dish, and any other technology
> to accomplish the task, to make a human from scratch using
> minerals and genetics. Like man can make a man, using stem
> cells, no womb need apply.....
>
> And the female was made with genes from the male....
> "A cheaper cut." <Archie Bunker>
>
> Then all hell broke loose when Cain was sent into the wilderness
> to interbreed with the 'people in the wilderness'. Who were they
> Bob......?
>
> He was afraid they would kill him......
>>
>>>>>>>You seem to think I'm confused about everything.....!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, yeah. Given your posts regarding "hybridization" and
>>>>>> your references to religious writings as evidence
>>>>>> for...something...I think that's a fair *****sment.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's because you're Godless......
>>>>
>>>> No, it's because I recognize the fundamental difference
>>>> between faith (which requires no evidence) and science
>>>> (which exists on evidence). Only those without faith talk
>>>> about "evidence" regarding religious beliefs.
>>>
>>>I'm NOT religious. I think all religion is bunk....
>>
>> Really? Who's this HaShem and all these "angels" you keep
>> nattering about?
>
> The Creator and His legions of angels/hosts. Made as man was
> made. They are sentient beings who have immortality. As we
> were made to have....but....well....you know....
>
> Angels who have the knowledge of good and evil. Angels who
> do no good, and angels who do no evil. See....hot and cold....
>
> We have the knowledge of good and evil, and do both.....we are
> lukewarm...therefore; "I spew you out of my mouth". <HaShem>
>>
>> Can anyone meet him/her/it/them in person?
>
> Yeah...give them back the crop markings...
>
> We're walking His turf with genetics, and stomping his, bargained
> for, 10% of the wheat every year. Rather than give the markings to
> whom, they belong.....
>
> It should be mandatory for Team Satan to put the diagram of the
> marking to be hoaxed, on the 'circlemakers.com', Website, BEFORE
> the fact of it appearing. Not AFTER the fact! Fair play.....!
>
> Don't you think.....?
>
> http://ufologie.net/htm/chorley01.htm
> One of the two 1991 dupes, who made the international media
> when they claimed they made ALL of the markings in England
> from 1978 to 1991. One of them died recently, (I think it was
> the elder Bower.) And on his death bed, made the confession;
> "We didn't make any of the markings."
>
> No ****.....!
>
> Accounts for absolutely nothing in the mainstream......
>
> "OH NO! HE DIDN'T MEAN THAT! IT WAS DRUG
> INDUCED!"
>
> Then it must have been, truth serum.....
>>
>>>I set out to find, what I found. Mainstream and non mainstream
>>>religionists, and the Atheist's, Nemesis....
>>>
>>>BINGO.....!
>>
>> You're really into free-association, aren't you?
>
> The game? No. Into free thinking though.....not a game...
>>
>>>>>Where did the seed of Islam and Judaism come from....?
>>>>>Can you deny their origin.....?
>>>>
>>>> Produce that origin. Oh, you can't? Imagine that...
>>>
>>>I have, plenty of times......
>>>
>>>Again.....pay ****ing attention.....
>>>
>>>Islam, the seed of Ishmael. Spawned by a rogue angel of
>
>> ...yadda, yadda, yadda, ad infinitum. I didn't ask for
>> imaginative testimony about it, I asked for you to *produce*
>> it. Seems you don't know what "produce" means either...
>
> Islam eXists.....I don't imagine that. I know it as a fact, as
> do, I know its origin. You know they eXist, but you freak
> out at their origin.....
>>
>>>All of you denying assholes, are ignorant of reality.
>>
>> You wouldn't know reality if it bit you on the ass.
>
> It certainly isn't your reality.....of denial......of reality...
>
> Islam was spawned by a rogue angel of HaShem.....
>
> There's a story behind how that angel got the right to be
> like the Most High.....and have his own seed put upon us.
> An angel who does no good. Would like to destroy the
> planet. Thank Almighty God He reigns over His hosts, and
> has a rein on them....
>
> God Almighty, the Christ and the angels, good and evil,
> are watching us......NOT....watching over us.....
>
> We're on our own.....
>
> Until we aks for help, of the hierarchy....
>
> I think we're going to need it, before the 2012, once
> in a 25,000 year, pole ****ft....
>
> The angels could take care of that comet......
>> --
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>> - McNameless
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
