On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:44:26 -0400, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:lmba045ghrvqih2056p9jec32q2hbqpgg0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:50:44 -0400, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:9n1uv3hsc2ouqqa1s7f3hg54g4av0gcuqh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:41:36 -0400, the following appeared in
>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>>.....I shove science at you all the time...
>>>>>Like genetics.....you reject it, all of the time.......
>>
>>>> You don't push science, since it's obvious from your posts
>>>> that you're scientifically illiterate.
>>
>>>In some fields yes. Just like you......
>>
>> But unlike you, I don't make pronouncements in fields in
>> which I'm illiterate. For you, that would be biology.
>
>Just genomes....
>
>Following the Biblical ancestral line...and how it runs right
>into us......intelligent, modern humans......
>>
>>>Are we, or are we not, 99.5%+ Neanderthal genome.....?
>>>Don't give me the bull**** of common ancestor. You can't
>>>produce one......
>>
>> Like I said, scientifically illiterate.
>
>Different sciences.....evidently the one in which you're not
>literate....
>
>> Thanks for confirming. Since we share 98% of our DNA with
>> chimps does that mean we interbred with them?
>
>More like 95% Chimp.....check it out. New technology....
>And it shows we are more like, 99.9% Neanderthal....
OK, Sparky, what percentage indicates that there was
cross-breeding? You can't write a check for "some value
between $95 and $99.90", so lets have an exact figure. And
then produce evidence (not more claims) that the figure is
accurate. Good luck on that...
>OUCH...huh.....?
Nope, just further confirmation that you're ignorant.
>Praise HaShem.....
>
>If Muslims are always praising Allah, just before they blow
>up themselves, and innocents, I'll praise HaShem for my
>Wisdom.....
If HaShem was responsible for the level of wisdom you
display here HaShem has a lot to answer for...
>>Since we share 40% of our DNA with flatworms does that
>>mean we interbred with them?
>
>Ahhh...you've been doing your homework......
Er, no, it's a fairly commonly-known figure.
>Of course not. It doesn't mean we interbred with flatworms.
>It means the genes are present. How did the genes get there?
We share a common ancestor, and genetics is very
conservative.
>The Neanderthal. We are the genetic sewer they were.......
>eXcept for .5 or 1%...of our genome.....
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
>>How about bananas; we share DNA with them too.
>>Or are all those somehow "different"?
>
>And you use that gene to think......you are dominant fruit.
>
>I know that we have them all. We ARE a genetic sewer....
You're an idiot, but I suspect it has more to do with
gullibility than genetics.
>Keep up with things in genetics will you please. It would
>make my life easier. You would have too agree.....
This from an idiot who thinks there's some magic percentage
(between 95% and 99.9%, using TwonkyWorld figures) of shared
genes that "proves" interbreeding occurred...
>> BTW, regarding "You can't produce one......" please see a
>> couple of comments below regarding things *you* can't
>> produce. And we *do* have sufficient evidence from the
>> fossil record to show a common ancestor, just not the "most
>> recent" common ancestor. Your refusal to accept (or even
>> examine without prejudice) the evidence isn't anyone's
>> problem but yours.
>
>Until you find your missing link, shut the **** up...
Your belief that the "missing link" is more than
journalistic hype confirms again your illiteracy in this
field. Thanks for the added data point.
>That missing link, is so the truth, stays missing.....
>
>The truth that intelligence comes from the gene of a parent!
And yet more errors; genetics is part of intelligence, but
only part. I'm surprised (not) that in your expertise (not)
you were unaware of this.
>What does the do for Darwin's evolution......?
What do *you* think it does? Do you think that any offspring
is incapable of mating with its immediate ancestors? If so,
that's yet *more* confirmation of your ignorance.
>>>If we didn't evolve from them, then Cain interbred with them.
>>
>> Produce Cain. Oh, you can't? Imagine that...
>
>See my "Aquarian Enlightenment" Post....
No. Address the issue, which *you* brought up.
>>>Simple......
>>
>> Yep, for anyone who thinks in sound bites.
>
>It's a straight line of ancestry and genetic engineering, dummy.
Is it? Be so good as to expand on this, particularly the
"genetic engineering" part. Was genetic engineering of
humans common at the time of the mythical Cain?
>>>>>You seem to think I'm confused about everything.....!
>>>>
>>>> Well, yeah. Given your posts regarding "hybridization" and
>>>> your references to religious writings as evidence
>>>> for...something...I think that's a fair assessment.
>>>
>>>That's because you're Godless......
>>
>> No, it's because I recognize the fundamental difference
>> between faith (which requires no evidence) and science
>> (which exists on evidence). Only those without faith talk
>> about "evidence" regarding religious beliefs.
>
>I'm NOT religious. I think all religion is bunk....
Really? Who's this HaShem and all these "angels" you keep
nattering about? Can anyone meet him/her/it/them in person?
>I set out to find, what I found. Mainstream and non mainstream
>religionists, and the Atheist's, Nemesis....
>
>BINGO.....!
You're really into free-association, aren't you?
>>>Where did the seed of Islam and Judaism come from....?
>>>Can you deny their origin.....?
>>
>> Produce that origin. Oh, you can't? Imagine that...
>
>I have, plenty of times......
>
>Again.....pay ****ing attention.....
>
>Islam, the seed of Ishmael. Spawned by a rogue angel of
....yadda, yadda, yadda, ad infinitum. I didn't ask for
imaginative testimony about it, I asked for you to *produce*
it. Seems you don't know what "produce" means either...
>All of you denying assholes, are ignorant of reality.
You wouldn't know reality if it bit you on the ass.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
