On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:50:44 -0400, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:9n1uv3hsc2ouqqa1s7f3hg54g4av0gcuqh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:41:36 -0400, the following appeared in
>> sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
<snip>
>>>.....I shove science at you all the time...
>>>Like genetics.....you reject it, all of the time.......
>> You don't push science, since it's obvious from your posts
>> that you're scientifically illiterate.
>In some fields yes. Just like you......
But unlike you, I don't make pronouncements in fields in
which I'm illiterate. For you, that would be biology.
>Are we, or are we not, 99.5%+ Neanderthal genome.....?
>Don't give me the bull**** of common ancestor. You can't
>produce one......
Like I said, scientifically illiterate. Thanks for
confirming. Since we share 98% of our DNA with chimps does
that mean we interbred with them?Since we share 40% of our
DNA with flatworms does that mean we interbred with them?
How about bananas; we share DNA with them too. Or are all
those somehow "different"?
BTW, regarding "You can't produce one......" please see a
couple of comments below regarding things *you* can't
produce. And we *do* have sufficient evidence from the
fossil record to show a common ancestor, just not the "most
recent" common ancestor. Your refusal to accept (or even
examine without prejudice) the evidence isn't anyone's
problem but yours.
>If we didn't evolve from them, then Cain interbred with them.
Produce Cain. Oh, you can't? Imagine that...
>Simple......
Yep, for anyone who thinks in sound bites.
>>>You seem to think I'm confused about everything.....!
>>
>> Well, yeah. Given your posts regarding "hybridization" and
>> your references to religious writings as evidence
>> for...something...I think that's a fair *****sment.
>
>That's because you're Godless......
No, it's because I recognize the fundamental difference
between faith (which requires no evidence) and science
(which exists on evidence). Only those without faith talk
about "evidence" regarding religious beliefs.
>Where did the seed of Islam and Judaism come from....?
>Can you deny their origin.....?
Produce that origin. Oh, you can't? Imagine that...
<snip the fundie version of "evidence">
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
