On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:41:36 -0400, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>
>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:c6onv3t6oak3sl8e21e3gbblugors95p3q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:52:55 -0400, the following appeared in
>> sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel/Messenger" <X>:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:fb5lv3tb9qr8h5fvudlk9qlhk2rboreepo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:23:32 -0400, the following appeared in
>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by "KING_FOLP" <KING_FOLP@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>>>
>>>>>Revenue and Technology of Clandestine Organizations
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, but the stuff you want is known as lithium
>>>> carbonate.
>>>
>>>You're great at giving out 'Scripts'........
>>>
>>>"Wanna **** with me? Show your **** at *MY* newsgroup.
>>>rec.aviation.piloting...."
>>> (Dan <danmc61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>)
>>>
>>>So I did, for you Bob.......show your ****....bull......
>>
>> What about the fact that Dan and I are two different people
>> is confusing you?
>
>What you just aksed me is.....confusing.....
Thanks for agreeing.
>> <snip blather>
>>
>>>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>>>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>>
>>>So nothing is right.....
>>
>> What is confusing you about the quote by McCoy? He's an
>> idiot, which should be obvious from the quote, and rejects
>> evidence regarding science, particularly evolution, in favor
>> of his pet beliefs. Sound familiar?
>
>Yeah....like you.....I shove science at you all the time...
>Like genetics.....you reject it, all of the time.......
You don't push science, since it's obvious from your posts
that you're scientifically illiterate.
>You seem to think I'm confused about everything.....!
Well, yeah. Given your posts regarding "hybridization" and
your references to religious writings as evidence
for...something...I think that's a fair *****sment.
>>>Therefore you can snip everything and make a dumbass
>>>comment. Drug induced.....
>>
>> I only snip irrelevant garbage, whether said garbage was
>> drug induced or merely the product of the sort of mind that
>> rejects reality and substitutes wishful thinking.
>>
>>>- McNameless
>>>
>>>No it's not. It has your name on it.....
>>
>> Not hardly; I accept evidence sup****ting conjectures as
>> tending to confirm the conjectures, unlike McCoy
>> (McNameless). Note that that's *evidence*, not further
>> assertions and conjectures. Apparently this concept gives
>> you trouble.
>
>99.5+% Neanderthal genome is a good argument for
>hybridization of (y)our species.
No, it's good evidence for a recent common ancestor. If you
understood even as much as I do you'd be aware of that.
> You have trouble with
>that concept.......
Yep. Unlike you, I have a good bit of trouble with most
erroneous concepts.
>What about that pole ****ft 2012....it seems like a gradual
>getting there......
>
>"Weather and earthquakes as man has never seen before."
>(Apocalypse)
>
>It's going to get worse, before it gets better......
More of your "science"?
>DST puts the Earth out of synch with rest of the
>Solar System, a subtle affect, on body & psyche.....
And still more?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
