On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:22:08 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
No snappy comeback, complete with reams of irrelevant
beliefs?
>On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:49:18 -0500, the following appeared in
>sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel"
><HybridAngel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
>>
>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:kvnrs3dmb27j6t49nnoeko79evruecprln@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:35:10 -0500, the following appeared in
>>> sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel"
>>> <HyabriAngel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
><snip aimless rambling>
>
>>>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>>>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>> - McNameless
>>
>>The stupidest thing Kozusko ever saw.......
>
>Yep, me too; that's why I use it. It's a quote from a
>fundamentalist denier of evidence, much like yourself. I use
>it to show how mindless such True Believers are.
>
>>Bye Bob.....
>
>Toodle-ooo.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
|
